![]() |
||
*停權中*
加入日期: Jun 2008
文章: 551
|
wiki 都有寫得更清楚更詳細, 範圍更廣的東西...
都有人要爭個半天... "Science (from Latin: scientia, meaning "knowledge") is a systematic enterprise of gathering knowledge about the world and organizing and condensing that knowledge into testable laws and theories.[1] As knowledge has increased, some methods have proved more reliable than others, and today the scientific method is the standard for science. It includes the use of careful observation, experimentation, measurement, mathematics, and replication — to be considered a science, a body of knowledge must stand up to repeated testing by independent observers. The use of the scientific method to make new discoveries is called scientific research, and the people who carry out this research are called scientists.[2][3] This article focuses on science in the more restricted sense, what is sometimes called experimental science. Applied science, or engineering, is the practical application of scientific knowledge. A scientific hypothesis is an educated guess about the nature of the universe, a scientific theory is a hypothesis which has been confirmed by repeated observation and measurement. Scientific theories are usually given mathematical form, and are always subject to refutation if future experiments contradict them. In the modern world, scientific research is a major activity in all developed nations, and scientists are expected to publish their discoveries in refereed journals, scientific periodicals where referees check the facts in an article before it is published. Even after publication, new scientific ideas are not generally accepted until the work has been replicated. Scientific literacy is the ability of the general population to understand the basic concepts related to science." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science) |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Mar 2010
文章: 29
|
引用:
不過有人會認為維基都是亂寫啊 ![]() 比如說我引用維基科學的定義好了,一定也有人回說維基的說法不盡可信 要不然就是回你說:你只會引用維基毫無自己的看法 |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Junior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Jan 2003
文章: 967
|
引用:
有中文版 http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%A6 還有,你提的是科學的定義 我們在討論的是科學就跟一般人眼中的科學。 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Mar 2010
文章: 29
|
引用:
但是你討論的東西跟科學的定義有很大的關係啊 如果你真的要討論出一個東西,我很難想像不會討論到甚麼是科學? ![]() 你問的問題跟科學的本質有很大關係,不討論甚麼是科學?科學的定義是甚麼?你會很難討論下去的 此文章於 2010-06-25 03:50 PM 被 MichaelLee 編輯. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Jun 2008
文章: 551
|
引用:
同樣都有可能是亂寫, 很明顯此例 wiki 的才有討論價值, 因為至少他講明白了! 不像樓主要閒扯蛋好幾頁, 才把根本一開始就應該先說明的東西講出來. 引用:
引用:
引用書, 也有人可以胡扯 "盡信書, 不如無書", 但是這句話不是 "有書, 不如無書" 因為這句的大前提是要先讀過書, 並且讀懂了內容, 不然只是沒讀過書, 談不上 "信", 也輪不到不如無書, 引用:
偶的看法就是現在的狀況是先把 wiki 理面講的讀懂了, 再來扯其他有的沒的. 此文章於 2010-06-25 04:10 PM 被 Cudacke-Dees 編輯. |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
Power Member
![]() ![]() 加入日期: Mar 2006
文章: 634
|
引用:
引用:
引用:
原來紅標字 . 是脫離語意所指 ..... 是您的自定義內容 . 別人無法以語意解釋的 廣大的科學領域被您自圓其說 + 縮小範圍成可高度量化的範疇中 . 把社會科學踢出去 我不想與您語言角力 我只想問 ...... 您在說啥 ?? 沒有人要戰您呀 .... |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Major Member
![]() 加入日期: Jun 2008
文章: 167
|
引用:
科學不會嘲笑打壓什麼,只會不承認違返科學的東西 例如,你說:只要我發功,明天太陽就會從西邊昇起 這明顯違反科學定律,所以我可以嘲笑你是迷信 如果只是因為不想承認而打壓,那明顯你把偽科學當科學了 所謂科學是要能反覆驗證並有所依據,不然南韓教授偽造肧胎實驗數據為什麼會被發現?科學真那麼簡單,他發個功就能複製人類不是? 在我看來,你只是不了解什麼是科學 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Master Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Mar 2006 您的住址: On Chip
文章: 2,202
|
引用:
已經解釋到李麥克都知道我要表達的事情了, 你還是要重提, 我是覺得明眼人都看的出來誰想戰, 我還是保持網路上認真就輸了的最高指導原則, 也最後一次回這篇了, 收工. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Mar 2010
文章: 29
|
引用:
不如就把一開始講的更正一下,這樣就更清楚了 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Power Member
![]() ![]() 加入日期: Mar 2006
文章: 634
|
引用:
這又何必呢 ?? 如果您認為我刻意引起您的不悅 ..... 我都很樂意道歉的 |
|
![]() |
![]() |