|
||
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Jan 2002
文章: 127
|
引用:
http://bit.ly/NDl9as The first-to-file system is used in all countries except for the United States, which will switch to a first-to-file system on March 16, 2013 after the enactment of the America Invents Act.[1] 這邊是說 first to file 要 March 16, 2013 才實施。 你給的 wiki 也有說了 The law will switch U.S. rights to a patent from the present "first-to-invent" system to a "first inventor-to-file" system for patent applications filed on or after March 16, 2013. 所以本案不適用吧？ 此文章於 2012-08-30 12:02 PM 被 oversky 編輯. |
||||||||
2012-08-30, 11:58 AM
#241
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Dec 2006
文章: 2,931
|
引用:
對，我去研究了法條原文...Sec 35...  |
|||
|
2012-08-30, 12:04 PM
#242
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Dec 2006
文章: 2,931
|
引用:
512 U.S. 26 (1994)  |
|
|
2012-08-30, 12:11 PM
#243
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Dec 2006
文章: 2,931
|
|
|
2012-08-30, 12:19 PM
#244
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Jan 2002
文章: 127
|
引用:
再請教一下，America Invents Act 有變動到 Conditions for patentability 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) 和 (b)嗎？ 如果沒有的話， first inventor 選擇公開發明而不是申請專利，仍然會破壞 first inventor-to-file 的 Conditions for patentability。 America Invents Act 應該是 first inventor 和 first inventor-to-file 兩造都沒公開發明且申請專利，才會影響到專利是誰的。 此文章於 2012-08-30 12:39 PM 被 oversky 編輯. |
|
|
2012-08-30, 12:36 PM
#245
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Aug 2003 您的住址: 台南市
文章: 77
|
引用:
那一直舉三菱做例子幹嘛？要是三菱覺得它有專利.它自然會告。三菱養的法務都是吃屎的？ 三菱公司無法把它的創意商品化來取得專利，而蘋果辦到了，反而是蘋果的錯？ 搞不好三菱也不知道這技術能幹嘛？只是好玩吧了 ，要是三菱行的話，那蘋果現在就在旁邊玩沙了⋯ 而且擧例的那段影片也有問題，無法證明是三菱的原始影片？ 此文章於 2012-08-30 12:56 PM 被 taisheng 編輯. |
|
|
2012-08-30, 12:51 PM
#246
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Dec 2006
文章: 2,931
|
引用:
AIA修正現行的Conditions for patentability, 可是還是有例外. 如果發明者在公開發明後1年內選擇申請專利還是OK的. 主要是針對共同發明人還有合作廠商之間的關係問題. http://www.uspto.gov/aia_implementa...q.jsp#heading-5 專利局回應的問題是根據下面這個例外條款... http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/201...ct-of-2011.html Exceptions- 1. DISCLOSURES MADE 1 YEAR OR LESS BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE FILING DATE OF THE CLAIMED INVENTION- A disclosure made 1 year or less before the effective filing date of a claimed invention shall not be prior art to the claimed invention under subsection (a)(1) if— A. the disclosure was made by the inventor or joint inventor or by another who obtained the subject matter disclosed directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor; or B. the subject matter disclosed had, before such disclosure, been publicly disclosed by the inventor or a joint inventor or another who obtained the subject matter disclosed directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor. 2. DISCLOSURES APPEARING IN APPLICATIONS AND PATENTS- A disclosure shall not be prior art to a claimed invention under subsection (a)(2) if-- A. the subject matter disclosed was obtained directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor; B. the subject matter disclosed had, before such subject matter was effectively filed under subsection (a)(2), been publicly disclosed by the inventor or a joint inventor or another who obtained the subject matter disclosed directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor; or C. the subject matter disclosed and the claimed invention, not later than the effective filing date of the claimed invention, were owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person. |
|
|
2012-08-30, 12:54 PM
#247
|
|
|
Elite Member
  
加入日期: Mar 2001 您的住址: Rivia
文章: 7,044
|
引用:
建議這篇先看一下.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DiamondTouch
__________________
Folding@home with GPGPU集中討論串 Unix Review: ArchLinux●Sabayon●OpenSolaris 2008.5●Ubuntu 8.10 AVs Review: GDTC●AntiVir SS●ESS●KIS 09●NIS 09●Norton 360 V3  I Always Get What I Want. |
|
|
2012-08-30, 01:01 PM
#248
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Aug 2003 您的住址: 台南市
文章: 77
|
引用:
對呀，這是桌上型的PC呀！ 蘋果有去告PC廠商嗎？ 而且2001三菱只有二點觸控，而蘋果進步到多點觸控。 |
|
|
2012-08-30, 01:08 PM
#249
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Jan 2002
文章: 127
|
引用:
發明人也可以選擇公開發明將其變成公眾財，讓世人「都」受益， 就像過期的專利一樣， 不是只有將發明申請為專利一條路而已。 蘋果的作法就是把公眾財佔為己有，不準其它人使用。 此文章於 2012-08-30 01:16 PM 被 oversky 編輯. |
|
|
2012-08-30, 01:12 PM
#250
|
|
