PCDVD數位科技討論區
PCDVD數位科技討論區   註冊 常見問題 標記討論區為已讀

回到   PCDVD數位科技討論區 > 電腦硬體討論群組 > 效能極限
帳戶
密碼
 

  回應
 
主題工具
nonomore
Major Member
 

加入日期: May 2002
文章: 209
Talking PIII VS PIV VS PM

很棒的測試
看來PIII寶刀未老
給大家作個參考︿_︿
http://publish.it168.com/2003/0529/...ositionCode=387







     
      
舊 2004-03-31, 01:25 AM #1
回應時引用此文章
nonomore離線中  
supermaxfight
Golden Member
 
supermaxfight的大頭照
 

加入日期: Jun 2002
您的住址: 地獄18層
文章: 3,248
P3-1.13GHz和我的Celeron1.3GHz分數一樣(CPU Mark99)....
不過資料量吞吐會輸是一定的...所以...
 
舊 2004-03-31, 04:22 AM #2
回應時引用此文章
supermaxfight離線中  
Arucueid
Master Member
 
Arucueid的大頭照
 

加入日期: Feb 2004
您的住址: 加拿大
文章: 2,391
PIII-T 512K...

我個人認為是Intel的經典...

若是當初不放棄Tualatin,我認為Intel不會被AMD打的這麼慘
__________________

Rule #12: Never date a co-worker.
Rule #13: Never involve lawyers.
Rule #23: Never mess with a Marine's coffee if you want to live!
Rule #51: Sometimes you are wrong

純白の吸血鬼は微笑む:私を殺した責任、とってもらうからわ - アルクエイド ブリュンスッド
貴方に出逢い STAR輝いて アタシが生まれて
Was aus Liebe gethan wird, geschieht immer Jenseits von Gut und Böse - Friedrick Wilhelm Nietzsche

Cain was the first man ever to strike down another... and when the Lord came to him and said ‘What have you done!?’, Cain could not hide his crime. For the voice of his brother’s blood cried out from the very ground

The world has been your battlefield, everywhere you go. The blood of brothers and sons screams out against you. Perhaps you cannot yet hear it, because the soil is not your own, but you will... you will
舊 2004-04-01, 09:54 AM #3
回應時引用此文章
Arucueid離線中  
plaything
Major Member
 

加入日期: Jul 2001
您的住址: taiwan
文章: 244
我不覺得...

Intel是非放棄Tualatin不可,因為時脈上不去了....
有多少人見過P3 or P-M跑超過2GHz的??
舊 2004-04-01, 12:15 PM #4
回應時引用此文章
plaything離線中  
Arucueid
Master Member
 
Arucueid的大頭照
 

加入日期: Feb 2004
您的住址: 加拿大
文章: 2,391
引用:
Originally posted by plaything
我不覺得...

Intel是非放棄Tualatin不可,因為時脈上不去了....
有多少人見過P3 or P-M跑超過2GHz的??


以效能取向的話,又何必瘋狂拉高時脈?

從上面的文章看來 P-M 1.6 就足以跟 P4 2.2~2.4匹敵,

更不用說高時脈容易帶來大量廢熱

所以若是在 Tualatin上繼續發展,所謂低時脈高效能,可能就不是 A-XP 了
__________________

Rule #12: Never date a co-worker.
Rule #13: Never involve lawyers.
Rule #23: Never mess with a Marine's coffee if you want to live!
Rule #51: Sometimes you are wrong

純白の吸血鬼は微笑む:私を殺した責任、とってもらうからわ - アルクエイド ブリュンスッド
貴方に出逢い STAR輝いて アタシが生まれて
Was aus Liebe gethan wird, geschieht immer Jenseits von Gut und Böse - Friedrick Wilhelm Nietzsche

Cain was the first man ever to strike down another... and when the Lord came to him and said ‘What have you done!?’, Cain could not hide his crime. For the voice of his brother’s blood cried out from the very ground

The world has been your battlefield, everywhere you go. The blood of brothers and sons screams out against you. Perhaps you cannot yet hear it, because the soil is not your own, but you will... you will
舊 2004-04-01, 12:49 PM #5
回應時引用此文章
Arucueid離線中  
luke929
Master Member
 
luke929的大頭照
 

加入日期: Mar 2002
您的住址: 台北市
文章: 2,195
引用:
Originally posted by Arucueid
PIII-T 512K...

我個人認為是Intel的經典...

若是當初不放棄Tualatin,我認為Intel不會被AMD打的這麼慘


無根據的發言?
Intel被AMD打的很慘?從什麼角度來看的?從哪一個時間點來看的?
每年經營虧損的是AMD可不是Intel阿

從純商業角度來說,Intel到目前為止都還沒"被AMD打的很慘"
舊 2004-04-01, 02:07 PM #6
回應時引用此文章
luke929離線中  
alience
Power Member
 

加入日期: Mar 2003
您的住址: 台北
文章: 597
引用:
Originally posted by Arucueid
以效能取向的話,又何必瘋狂拉高時脈?

從上面的文章看來 P-M 1.6 就足以跟 P4 2.2~2.4匹敵,

更不用說高時脈容易帶來大量廢熱

所以若是在 Tualatin上繼續發展,所謂低時脈高效能,可能就不是 A-XP 了


Tualatin同時脈底下也不是Axp的對手
P-M才贏過Axp
可是問題是Tualatin同製程底下時脈也拉不過Axp
若是intel那時沒有推出P4架構的話
2003年FSB800的P4完全壓住Axp的狀況可能就看不到了
繼續使用Tualatin更有可能ㄧ路被AMD壓著打
舊 2004-04-01, 04:10 PM #7
回應時引用此文章
alience離線中  
nonomore
Major Member
 

加入日期: May 2002
文章: 209
從另一個方向考慮
AMD-XP已經支援 DDR
Intel-P!!! Tualatin卻僅支援 SDRM
雖然VIA有推出支援Intel-P!!! Tualatin
且可用DDR的Apollo Pro266
但對於效能提升卻無多大助益
畢竟PIII的FSB是133
AMD-XP卻由266起跳
AMD-XP的架構贏過PIII太多

不過相同時脈的PIII卻可以狂勝P IV
這是INTEL再不斷提升時脈下要回過頭來檢討的
畢竟高時脈代表高耗能
但是效能卻未必能同必提升
據說INTEL將用P-M系列的架構取代P-IV
用300-500-700系列來取代時脈命名
我想多少受到AMD K7/K8狂勝P-IV的影響
不過撇開CPU的架構
INTEL的系統晶片ChipSet及CPU多媒體指令(SSE/SSE2/SSE3)還是有一定的優勢
這是為何865/867+P-IV組合仍存在相當多支持的原因吧
舊 2004-04-02, 05:43 AM #8
回應時引用此文章
nonomore離線中  
Arucueid
Master Member
 
Arucueid的大頭照
 

加入日期: Feb 2004
您的住址: 加拿大
文章: 2,391
引用:
Originally posted by luke929
無根據的發言?
Intel被AMD打的很慘?從什麼角度來看的?從哪一個時間點來看的?
每年經營虧損的是AMD可不是Intel阿
從純商業角度來說,Intel到目前為止都還沒"被AMD打的很慘"


抱歉...我沒說清楚...是說CPU的性價比上面


引用:
Originally posted by alience
Tualatin同時脈底下也不是Axp的對手
P-M才贏過Axp
可是問題是Tualatin同製程底下時脈也拉不過Axp
若是intel那時沒有推出P4架構的話
2003年FSB800的P4完全壓住Axp的狀況可能就看不到了
繼續使用Tualatin更有可能ㄧ路被AMD壓著打


我又讓人誤解了...我中文不太好,抱歉=.=

我是說對Tualatin進行類似 P-M的改良,

認為是較好的選擇

不過,這的確違反了Intel的行銷策略...

因為很多人不管效能,只在乎數字大小,偏偏這些人又佔多數
__________________

Rule #12: Never date a co-worker.
Rule #13: Never involve lawyers.
Rule #23: Never mess with a Marine's coffee if you want to live!
Rule #51: Sometimes you are wrong

純白の吸血鬼は微笑む:私を殺した責任、とってもらうからわ - アルクエイド ブリュンスッド
貴方に出逢い STAR輝いて アタシが生まれて
Was aus Liebe gethan wird, geschieht immer Jenseits von Gut und Böse - Friedrick Wilhelm Nietzsche

Cain was the first man ever to strike down another... and when the Lord came to him and said ‘What have you done!?’, Cain could not hide his crime. For the voice of his brother’s blood cried out from the very ground

The world has been your battlefield, everywhere you go. The blood of brothers and sons screams out against you. Perhaps you cannot yet hear it, because the soil is not your own, but you will... you will
舊 2004-04-02, 08:38 AM #9
回應時引用此文章
Arucueid離線中  
Arucueid
Master Member
 
Arucueid的大頭照
 

加入日期: Feb 2004
您的住址: 加拿大
文章: 2,391
引用:
Originally posted by nonomore

不過相同時脈的PIII卻可以狂勝P IV
這是INTEL再不斷提升時脈下要回過頭來檢討的
畢竟高時脈代表高耗能
但是效能卻未必能同必提升
據說INTEL將用P-M系列的架構取代P-IV



的確啊,所以,我才會認為,若是對Tualatin改良,而不是全力推展P4,Intel 2001~2002 之間不會打的那麼辛苦,CPU被批性價比差...

不過,若是沒有P-4為新技術開路(SSE2,HT...etc),會不會有P-M也有點令人懷疑



另外,Intel的確打算在2006年以筆記型的CPU架構統一桌上型與筆記型...製程是65~45奈米,代號Merom的多核心CPU 應該不再只是HT虛擬另一顆,而是兩個或更多的核心
__________________

Rule #12: Never date a co-worker.
Rule #13: Never involve lawyers.
Rule #23: Never mess with a Marine's coffee if you want to live!
Rule #51: Sometimes you are wrong

純白の吸血鬼は微笑む:私を殺した責任、とってもらうからわ - アルクエイド ブリュンスッド
貴方に出逢い STAR輝いて アタシが生まれて
Was aus Liebe gethan wird, geschieht immer Jenseits von Gut und Böse - Friedrick Wilhelm Nietzsche

Cain was the first man ever to strike down another... and when the Lord came to him and said ‘What have you done!?’, Cain could not hide his crime. For the voice of his brother’s blood cried out from the very ground

The world has been your battlefield, everywhere you go. The blood of brothers and sons screams out against you. Perhaps you cannot yet hear it, because the soil is not your own, but you will... you will
舊 2004-04-02, 08:50 AM #10
回應時引用此文章
Arucueid離線中  


    回應


POPIN
主題工具

發表文章規則
不可以發起新主題
不可以回應主題
不可以上傳附加檔案
不可以編輯您的文章

vB 代碼打開
[IMG]代碼打開
HTML代碼關閉



所有的時間均為GMT +8。 現在的時間是03:19 AM.


vBulletin Version 3.0.1
powered_by_vbulletin 2025。