|
||
|
Major Member
 加入日期: Apr 2002 您的住址: 台北
文章: 153
|
小弟用了2台試了一下....看來這個程式偏愛INTEL喔
*****AMD XP2400+(512DDR RAM)***** AMD Athlon(tm) Processor CPU speed: 2000.34 MHz CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE L1 cache size: 64 KB L2 cache size: 256 KB L1 cache line size: 64 bytes L2 cache line size: 64 bytes L1 TLBS: 32 L2 TLBS: 256 Prime95 version 23.7, RdtscTiming=1 Best time for 384K FFT length: 37.259 ms. Best time for 448K FFT length: 43.673 ms. Best time for 512K FFT length: 46.876 ms. Best time for 640K FFT length: 59.976 ms. Best time for 768K FFT length: 72.238 ms. Best time for 896K FFT length: 86.463 ms. Best time for 1024K FFT length: 97.448 ms. Best time for 1280K FFT length: 133.478 ms. Best time for 1536K FFT length: 156.167 ms. Best time for 1792K FFT length: 198.470 ms. Best time for 2048K FFT length: 227.832 ms. *****Celeron 2.0GHz(256DDR RAM)***** Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.00GHz CPU speed: 1992.01 MHz CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2 L1 cache size: 8 KB L2 cache size: 128 KB L1 cache line size: 64 bytes L2 cache line size: 128 bytes TLBS: 64 Prime95 version 23.7, RdtscTiming=1 Best time for 384K FFT length: 25.348 ms. Best time for 448K FFT length: 32.006 ms. Best time for 512K FFT length: 40.263 ms. Best time for 640K FFT length: 42.155 ms. Best time for 768K FFT length: 52.723 ms. Best time for 896K FFT length: 60.174 ms. Best time for 1024K FFT length: 67.737 ms. Best time for 1280K FFT length: 100.652 ms. Best time for 1536K FFT length: 126.282 ms. Best time for 1792K FFT length: 162.147 ms. Best time for 2048K FFT length: 190.859 ms. 這只能說...太神奇了  |
|||||||
2004-01-03, 02:51 PM
#71
|
|
|
Master Member
  
加入日期: Dec 2001 您的住址: 台中大里、台南市
文章: 1,668
|
引用:
由這個數據來看，Prime95並不適合拿來當效能測試程式，所有的效能測試程式以及用商用軟體實測都顯示P4 Celeron效能其差無比，也足以證明平常跑應用程式，賽揚的表現會最差(這點不會有人懷疑吧) 而Prime95測出的數據竟然是Celeron2.0勝過XP2400.... 因此弟認為Prime95拿來當穩定度測試可以，拿來測效能→無法反應真實狀況，不恰當且不適合！ |
|||
|
2004-01-03, 04:23 PM
#72
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Oct 2001
文章: 1,068
|
引用:
嗯！弟亦認為實用為主才是重點.... |
|
|
2004-01-03, 06:34 PM
#73
|
|
|
Master Member
加入日期: Dec 1999
文章: 2,066
|
AMD Athlon(tm)
CPU speed: 1672.77 MHz CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE L1 cache size: 64 KB L2 cache size: 256 KB L1 cache line size: 64 bytes L2 cache line size: 64 bytes L1 TLBS: 32 L2 TLBS: 256 Prime95 version 23.7, RdtscTiming=1 Best time for 384K FFT length: 34.913 ms. Best time for 448K FFT length: 40.070 ms. Best time for 512K FFT length: 43.359 ms. Best time for 640K FFT length: 58.097 ms. Best time for 768K FFT length: 69.307 ms. Best time for 896K FFT length: 83.497 ms. Best time for 1024K FFT length: 92.594 ms. Best time for 1280K FFT length: 120.923 ms. Best time for 1536K FFT length: 146.799 ms. Best time for 1792K FFT length: 178.465 ms. Best time for 2048K FFT length: 206.597 ms. 8RDA+ 166外頻 256mb ram 2-2-2-11 |
|
2004-01-03, 08:40 PM
#74
|
|
|
Elite Member
加入日期: May 2002
文章: 7,865
|
的確不太適合反應"效能" 因為Prime95似乎真的是跟大頻寬有關聯,跟SEE2 的支援度上倒是還好吧...因為我使用 A64 3000+ 測試的結果也是只比 AthlonXP 3200+(200x11)好上一些罷了.......跟 P4 800 比起來還是輸(A64可是也支援所謂的SEE2指令集的
 ) 所以誰的頻寬粗在 Prime95之下就佔優勢了(A64依然是單通道設計)但是以整體能力 例如 3D Mark2001 來說 A64 3000+的成績卻可跟 P4 3G抗衡  |
|
2004-01-03, 08:53 PM
#75
|
|
|
Major Member
加入日期: Dec 2003 您的住址: 江戶
文章: 113
|
AMD TB 1.0G oc 1.33G + ASUS A7V133 + 512mb PC-133 SD-Ram
代碼:
[Sat Jan 03 21:22:11 2004] AMD Athlon(tm) Processor CPU speed: 1343.00 MHz CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX L1 cache size: 64 KB L2 cache size: 256 KB L1 cache line size: 64 bytes L2 cache line size: 64 bytes L1 TLBS: 24 L2 TLBS: 256 Prime95 version 23.7, RdtscTiming=1 Best time for 384K FFT length: 55.506 ms. Best time for 448K FFT length: 63.584 ms. Best time for 512K FFT length: 68.454 ms. Best time for 640K FFT length: 94.860 ms. Best time for 768K FFT length: 111.369 ms. Best time for 896K FFT length: 134.306 ms. Best time for 1024K FFT length: 151.003 ms. Best time for 1280K FFT length: 205.995 ms. Best time for 1536K FFT length: 249.436 ms. Best time for 1792K FFT length: 314.981 ms. Best time for 2048K FFT length: 366.397 ms. |
|
2004-01-03, 08:55 PM
#76
|
|
|
New Member
加入日期: Dec 2003
文章: 8
|
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz
CPU speed: 3000.20 MHz CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2 L1 cache size: 8 KB L2 cache size: 512 KB L1 cache line size: 64 bytes L2 cache line size: 128 bytes TLBS: 64 Prime95 version 23.7, RdtscTiming=1 Best time for 384K FFT length: 12.054 ms. Best time for 448K FFT length: 14.325 ms. Best time for 512K FFT length: 16.415 ms. Best time for 640K FFT length: 19.569 ms. Best time for 768K FFT length: 23.897 ms. Best time for 896K FFT length: 28.298 ms. Best time for 1024K FFT length: 31.701 ms. Best time for 1280K FFT length: 41.920 ms. Best time for 1536K FFT length: 51.227 ms. Best time for 1792K FFT length: 60.878 ms. Best time for 2048K FFT length: 69.139 ms. |
|
2004-01-03, 09:42 PM
#77
|
|
|
Golden Member
加入日期: Oct 2000 您的住址: 台北市
文章: 3,232
|
引用:
Athlon 64 3000+的PR值，大家應該都沒有意見才對 ，但是"Athlon 3000+"就必須給個  。
__________________
|
|
|
2004-01-03, 11:15 PM
#78
|
|
|
Power Member
加入日期: Mar 2003 您的住址: 台北
文章: 597
|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by yunono
[B]小弟用了2台試了一下....看來這個程式偏愛INTEL喔 *****AMD XP2400+(512DDR RAM)***** AMD Athlon(tm) Processor CPU speed: 2000.34 MHz CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE L1 cache size: 64 KB L2 cache size: 256 KB L1 cache line size: 64 bytes L2 cache line size: 64 bytes L1 TLBS: 32 L2 TLBS: 256 Prime95 version 23.7, RdtscTiming=1 Best time for 384K FFT length: 37.259 ms. Best time for 448K FFT length: 43.673 ms. Best time for 512K FFT length: 46.876 ms. Best time for 640K FFT length: 59.976 ms. Best time for 768K FFT length: 72.238 ms. Best time for 896K FFT length: 86.463 ms. Best time for 1024K FFT length: 97.448 ms. Best time for 1280K FFT length: 133.478 ms. Best time for 1536K FFT length: 156.167 ms. Best time for 1792K FFT length: 198.470 ms. Best time for 2048K FFT length: 227.832 ms. 大大您的2400+有點慢喔 小弟是Axp 166x10 8RDA+ 512MB RAM 11-2-2-2 DDR333 win xp pro sp1結果如下 AMD Athlon(tm) Processor CPU speed: 1667 MHz CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE L1 cache size: 64 KB L2 cache size: 256 KB L1 cache line size: 64 bytes L2 cache line size: 64 bytes L1 TLBS: 32 L2 TLBS: 256 Prime95 version 23.7, RdtscTiming=1 Best time for 384K FFT length: 33.523 ms. Best time for 448K FFT length: 38.453 ms. Best time for 512K FFT length: 41.324 ms. Best time for 640K FFT length: 55.865 ms. Best time for 768K FFT length: 66.339 ms. Best time for 896K FFT length: 80.369 ms. Best time for 1024K FFT length: 88.770 ms. Best time for 1280K FFT length: 116.401 ms. Best time for 1536K FFT length: 140.374 ms. Best time for 1792K FFT length: 171.482 ms. Best time for 2048K FFT length: 197.414 ms. 而且我的背景還有跑騾子,FTP server和一堆有的沒的10幾個程式 會差在哪裡呢??1667居然比2000快?? 我猜這程式不只對sse2最佳化 而是對整個P4的Netbrust架構最佳化 至於A64會輸 我猜是因為還沒有最佳化的關係 |
|
2004-01-04, 12:06 AM
#79
|
|
|
Advance Member
加入日期: Aug 2002 您的住址: COME FROM 嘉義
文章: 318
|
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz
CPU speed: 3244.75 MHz CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2 L1 cache size: 8 KB L2 cache size: 512 KB L1 cache line size: 64 bytes L2 cache line size: 128 bytes TLBS: 64 Prime95 version 23.7, RdtscTiming=1 Best time for 384K FFT length: 11.144 ms. Best time for 448K FFT length: 13.277 ms. Best time for 512K FFT length: 15.064 ms. Best time for 640K FFT length: 18.092 ms. Best time for 768K FFT length: 22.067 ms. Best time for 896K FFT length: 26.172 ms. Best time for 1024K FFT length: 29.236 ms. Best time for 1280K FFT length: 38.358 ms. Best time for 1536K FFT length: 47.136 ms. Best time for 1792K FFT length: 56.113 ms. Best time for 2048K FFT length: 63.473 ms. [Sat Jan 03 16:41:00 2004] |
|
2004-01-04, 01:53 AM
#80
|
|
