三爽抄襲官司，蘋果贏了，網友討論，靈異又刪文了！

oversky

*停權中*

加入日期: Jan 2002

文章: 127

iPad設計專利申請再次被俄當局駁回

http://bit.ly/V4liGW

在過去兩年的時間裡，蘋果一直想要在俄羅斯獲得 iPad 的經典商業外形——即圓角、平滑機身平面、以及圓形按鍵的設計的專利。而這一次已經是俄羅斯當局第二次駁回蘋果的申請。

俄當局表示，蘋果所指的商業外形對於現代通訊設備來說已經算是一種趨勢，這些設備只會存會尺寸、按鍵佈局等方面的差異，因此外形專利毫無必要

2012-11-29, 10:29 AM #651

oversky

*停權中*

加入日期: Jan 2002

文章: 127

Apple 在荷蘭又下一城，贏下對 Samsung 的「橡皮圈」專利案

http://engt.co/V4lC8l

他們給了 Samsung 八週的時間對旗下侵犯專利的裝置進行修改
如果八週以後 Samsung 還沒有更新這些裝置或將其撤出市場的話，每過一天他們就會被罰款十萬美元

2012-11-29, 10:32 AM #652

oversky

*停權中*

加入日期: Jan 2002

文章: 127

Samsung 律師團這次提出了很有趣的論點：double-patenting，也就是同一件發明申請了兩個以上的專利。

http://bit.ly/WDjlT7

the verdict found that some Samsung products -- specifically the Vibrant (JZX1010), the Galaxy S (i9000)(JX 1007), and the Galaxy S 4G (JX 1019) to infringe both the '677 and the '087 patents.

判決書說這三台同時侵犯了'677 和 '087 這兩個造型專利。但是一件產品「理論」上應該只能和一種造型專利相像。也就是說陪審團無法分辨這兩個專利那裏不一樣。因此Samsung 律師團認為比較晚申請的的 '677 專利應該無效。

Third, the D'677 patent is invalid for double-patenting. Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186, 198 (1894) (second patent must be "substantially different" from first). D'677 and embodiments of D'087 (particularly the sixth embodiment) depict the same design; the only elements added by the D'677 are the color black and oblique lines, features that do not make D'677 "a separate invention, distinctly different and independent," id at 198, and the D'087 subsumes the D'677 because Apple admits that "the flat front surface [of D'087] could be any color. It could be transparent. It could be anything." RT 1019212-17.5

_________________
5 Apple claimed that the same Apple devices that embody D'087 also embody D‚'677 (RT 1021:16-1023:22), and that the same Samsung devices that infringe D'087 also infringe D'677. RT 1049:6-23, 1056:6-1057:24; 1060:7-1064:11.

我是覺得很有說服力。

2012-12-03, 03:46 PM #655

不要問 Master Member 加入日期: Mar 2005 文章: 1,851	http://tw.news.yahoo.com/大逆轉-和解有望-三星鬆口釋善意-現在發球權在蘋果手上-052509299.html http://tw.news.yahoo.com/蘋果三星專利大戰-法官勸�[-090906507--finance.html 那有這樣的法官 __________________ History doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme 暫離..... 此文章於 2012-12-07 09:58 PM 被不要問編輯.
2012-12-07, 09:56 PM #656

megag5

*停權中*

加入日期: Oct 2010

您的住址: 四季如夏的地方

文章: 2,596

引用:

作者不要問

http://tw.news.yahoo.com/大逆轉-和解有望-三星鬆口釋善意-現在發球權在蘋果手上-052509299.html
http://tw.news.yahoo.com/蘋果三星專利大戰-法官勸�[-090906507--finance.html

那有這樣的法官

美國法官會勸雙方和解不要繼續浪費法庭資源，可是直接命令和解這就犯規了，懷疑是翻譯有問題要不然就是氣話...
不過法官在裁定下次開庭時間時可以先開pre-trial conference, 就是先談和解的可能.

2012-12-07, 10:06 PM #657

oversky

*停權中*

加入日期: Jan 2002

文章: 127

和 Groklaw 在法庭現場觀察的情勢相反。

http://bit.ly/VBTtvA

We have our first report from the US District Court in San Jose, CA,

And it appears from our report that the media may be overplaying somewhat that Samsung said peace was up to Apple, that the ball was in Apple's court, as if Samsung is ready to settle. I see nothing to corroborate that yet in our reporter's notes. What they actually said was a lot sharper, with the meaning intended to be that Apple is the problem. Samsung accused Apple of going to Samsung's suppliers after the jury verdict and scaring them by claiming the verdict meant they couldn't sell the affected Samsung products any more. It's the judge, the Hon. Lucy Koh, who really wants the parties to settle this. But there was no settlement.

2012-12-07, 10:44 PM #658

oversky 停權中加入日期: Jan 2002 文章: 127	美國專利局再審 Apple multi-touch 專利，「初步」判定為無效。 Apple's Multi-touch Patent Found Preliminarily Invalid http://bit.ly/Vp407Q http://tnw.co/Vp4evL 此文章於 2012-12-08 09:45 AM 被 oversky 編輯.
2012-12-08, 09:42 AM #659

oversky 停權中加入日期: Jan 2002 文章: 127	Apple's Pinch to Zoom Patent Preliminarily Invalidated by USPTO http://bit.ly/VQZiQ9 蘋果縮放專利被專利局初步判定無效。
2012-12-20, 09:53 AM #660

第66頁共67頁

« 第一

« 上一主題 | 下一主題 »

POPIN

主題工具
顯示可列印版本傳送本頁給好友

發表文章規則
您不可以發起新主題您不可以回應主題您不可以上傳附加檔案您不可以編輯您的文章 vB 代碼打開表情圖示打開 [IMG]代碼打開 HTML代碼關閉

所有的時間均為GMT +8。現在的時間是06:11 AM.