|
||
|
Junior Member
  加入日期: Oct 2004
文章: 890
|
引用:
其實我覺得不用考慮那麼複雜，廠商要決定他出什麼樣的產品 就要為他的效能負責...不然說來..那個有9mb快取的Itanium2 還真是有點遜掉了...要是Intel現在有本領出24mb的Itanium2 效能幹掉FX55，我覺得一樣有可以讚揚他之處 |
||||||||
2004-11-25, 02:12 PM
#41
|
|
|
New Member
加入日期: Feb 2003
文章: 4
|
引用:
特許的技術爛很多! 曾在特許, LG, UMC, TSMC下過單的人留 |
|||
|
2004-11-25, 02:34 PM
#42
|
|
|
Junior Member
加入日期: Oct 2004
文章: 890
|
引用:
Attention!! Without O.C. Dothan 755 is almost bloody murdered by AMD FX55. Clock ,system bus and memory speed is the stuff that counts when doing something such as enconding or compression.I cant agree with you more..... But....Is there anybody force Dothan to run higher clock or higher FSB？？？Nobody. One 10ghz Dothan with 2000mhz FSB and 32mb cache must be very cool....everyone knows....thats blether. Manufacturer provides products accorsding to the technology ,yield rate ,acceptance and possibility,right？ My point is the unfounded estimate of future doesnt has lots value . The non-standardlized (O.C） consequence could be taken it as a reference , not a self-contented reason. So..the truth is...Dothan 755 is surely bloody murdered by AMD FX55 nowaday....Dont be sad..today is just a brief not always. |
|
|
2004-11-25, 02:56 PM
#43
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Apr 2001 您的住址: 冰島
文章: 1,558
|
引用:
因為我根本沒說Dothan不能上3G呀  |
|
|
2004-11-25, 04:10 PM
#44
|
|
|
Junior Member
加入日期: Oct 2004
文章: 890
|
引用:
Dothan的管線深度好像跟K8差不多，記得都是12階左右 而目前90nm的Dothan只到2.13ghz，130nm的K8出到2.6ghz 這樣的趨勢，會讓人覺得90nm的K8時脈會比Dothan更好 不過這也是推測而已....事實上沒人知道90nm的K8可以跑多少 也沒人知道90nm的Dothan是否會做到比2.13ghz還要高非常多 |
|
|
2004-11-25, 07:05 PM
#45
|
|
|
Power Member
 
加入日期: Nov 2001 您的住址: moving...
文章: 521
|
90nm K8超頻方面表現還不錯
http://www.chip.de/artikel/c_artike...tml?tid1=&tid2= 有人將90nm Athlon64 3000+(939pin,1.8G)使用盒裝風扇超至2.7G,相當於4400+,4500+左右的速度 K8要上到3G,目前的情況看來是樂觀的  |
|
2004-11-26, 04:07 PM
#46
|
|
|
Advance Member
加入日期: Oct 2004
文章: 313
|
引用:
那世界排第三的大陸中芯又如何  http://news.mydrivers.com/pages/200...55406_78386.htm |
|
|
2004-11-26, 10:14 PM
#47
|
|
