![]() |
||
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Apr 2003
文章: 1,011
|
引用:
該公司可接受國外訂單(當然包括台灣)。 付款方式說明: 如果是香港以外的國家,請先下訂單, 然後用e-mail 確定國際速遞運費,然後客戶可以去當地的銀行買一張港幣匯票,請把匯票寄到: 香港灣仔軒尼詩道298號298電腦特區2樓217號 --超頻專門店有限公司收 ----- abin兄不是嫌Corsair Hydrocool200很醜嗎?! |
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
Major Member
![]() 加入日期: Jan 2003 您的住址: 台北市
文章: 287
|
引用:
外型式不美,但我要用Koolance 的水冷頭(CPU 200G)配上這外接的怪物,應該不錯. 我有看過付款說明:但在上面直接下單,就出現台灣區為不出貨區(傷腦中) |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Mar 2003 您的住址: 米國早安州的熱血台灣人
文章: 2,804
|
引用:
所向披靡,好評不斷...? ![]() 是嗎? 我聽說的是因為CPU的水冷頭無法完全貼平DIE.. Cosair準備回收改善,所以才沒貨的! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Apr 2003
文章: 1,011
|
引用:
從哪聽說的?能否告知出處。 若水冷頭無法貼平DIE,那為何THG測出來的效果勝過其他水冷?! 而且Hydrocool200在其他的網站Review也都表現不錯… |
|
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Apr 2001 您的住址: 香港
文章: 1,441
|
引用:
我有到他們的討論區看過,應該沒問題的。abin兄想敗的東東怎可能敗不到,請狠狠的敗下去吧! 至於狂大所說的可能跟扣具有關,不過從各網站中的測試報告來看,這個問題應該不嚴重。如果是擔心的,那用別家的水冷頭該沒問題。 不過只附上能用於處理器的水冷頭確實不足夠,從照片看其膠管好像拆不掉,無法配合其他的水冷頭﹙如gpu﹚使用。 此文章於 2003-06-19 03:55 PM 被 熱鬥小狐 編輯. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Apr 2001 您的住址: 香港
文章: 1,441
|
剛才看了[H]ard|OCP的Corsair Hydrocool 200評論,有一點負面,但經過改裝配合Koolance CPU-200G水冷頭使用,還真的滿強的:
http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NDUx 另外想問,銅水冷頭加鋁散熱排,配合蒸餾水使用會有評論所說的問題(腐蝕和堵塞)出現嘛? 此文章於 2003-06-20 01:14 AM 被 熱鬥小狐 編輯. |
![]() |
![]() |
Major Member
![]() 加入日期: Jan 2003 您的住址: 台北市
文章: 287
|
我已和他們用Email聯絡上,是可寄到台灣總價(含運費和兩地銀行手續費)約港幣2500,
但台灣方面還得付個5%TAX,比koolance購入價便宜一些,但他們的網頁有些Bug在,所以我無法在網頁上訂購成功,不過目前還沒有貨,等一有現貨,用Bank Transfer付款,很快 能寄到台灣.真想試試這怪物搭配Koolance CPU-200G水冷頭,到底比Koolance 的EXOS還強多少. 引用:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Mar 2003 您的住址: 米國早安州的熱血台灣人
文章: 2,804
|
引用:
喔!不好意思!不是聽說! 上次我真的忘了在那一個網站看到! IPKonfig和Tom的測試真的都很.."誇大" THG? 錢拿的多而已... 個人很少看THG...商業氣太重..誰錢給的多誰的東西最好! 我會把那篇找出來! 還有!不相信的人買來用用看不就知道! 如果好的話, Newegg不會進25組還賣不出一組! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Mar 2003 您的住址: 米國早安州的熱血台灣人
文章: 2,804
|
不是要吐啥!只是不希望大家追大牌
這種水冷你敢用,那算狂少說廢話! ![]() **請點連結看圖**, http://www.dwpg.com/viewimage.php?i.../47587893.pjpeg OPS兄,劣者知道你英文不錯! 好好讀這review吧!還有以下這段話!希望你不會看不懂! 所以THG是啥? BS... Ed. note 1: We have read a few reviews on other sites, and they do not report any problems with the waterblock, nor any mention of noisy pumps. Two of them are ipKonfig.com and Overclockers.com. The unit used in this review will be sent back to Corsair for examination. We will post an update as soon as we know more. ************************************************** From HardOCP: Looking at the Hydrocool 200 objectively, the system needs to have some design flaws addressed before it can be recommended to the performance crowd. The system would greatly benefit from a few minor tweaks but overall the Delphi CPU water block is what holds this system back. The “Microchannel Surface Technology”, while great in theory, falls short in many ways. Poor construction, less than stellar performance and a design that prevents any form of maintenance just isn’t acceptable. In the grand scheme of things, I would like to see Delphi put out another revision of this block that remedies problems we have outlined in this review. Quality control can easily address the concave mating surface of the block that should drastically improve the system’s cooling ability. Still though, you have to question the quality control of the manufacturing company that cannot machine something flat. .... At this point, I think it may be wise to give Corsair a chance to nurture this new relationship with Delphi, work out the kinks and look into a revised version of the Hydrocool line of stand alone water cooling units. Maybe something along the lines of the Hydrocool 300 will earn a recommendation from us; unfortunately we simply cannot recommend this unit to anyone at this time. 我不知道說像這樣的評論與實測,還有人會砸錢下去?錢多嗎?拿點出來做社會公益! ![]() 至少HardOCP比THG誠實多了! 此文章於 2003-06-20 02:26 AM 被 狂之風 編輯. |
![]() |
![]() |