|
||
|
Senior Member
 
加入日期: Sep 2001 您的住址: 台北市
文章: 1,037
|
引用:
也許有在談長約的事，只是價碼是不是三千萬，我是有點懷疑。 如果原來的一年約洋基只肯出320萬，談到後來會變成4年3000萬（平均一年750萬），比Cano經紀人原來開的一年455萬還高出一大截？那洋基的談判人員豈不變成要五毛給一塊？ 如果傳的是四年2000萬~2500萬，我覺得可能性還高一點。
__________________
================= 我從來不把錢當錢看 我都是把錢當命看！  ================= 所謂理論，就是大家知道為什麼，但實際上行不通 所謂實務，就是沒有人知道為什麼，但實際上行得通 本公司已經完美結合了理論與實務： 什麼都行不通，而且沒有人知道為什麼 
此文章於 2008-01-25 10:34 AM 被 老飛俠 編輯. |
||||||||
2008-01-25, 10:32 AM
#91
|
|
|
Major Member
加入日期: Sep 2003
文章: 244
|
引用:
要是年年都能交出穩定的成績,400,600,850,1150也合理啊 |
|||
|
2008-01-25, 12:04 PM
#92
|
|
|
Senior Member
加入日期: Sep 2001 您的住址: 台北市
文章: 1,037
|
引用:
我是從兩邊的心態來推論的，洋基既然一開始開口給的是一年約320萬，表示應該是有想殺價省錢的意圖，在這種待遇攻防中如果資方要讓步給長約，應該會以拉低平均價當談判手段。 以選手立場來講，他們必須在長約有保障或是賭來年打出更好成績可以開更高價續約之間做選擇，對於Cano這種還不用擔心馬上會跑掉的選手，不用兩者都讓步吧！（對於重量級自由球員才可能必須又給長約又給高薪，因為你不給別隊肯給，人家就不甩你了） 以落磯隊的Tulowitzki為例，他拿到六年3000萬的約，以他這樣的身手，只要不受傷，這六年期間平均一年只要花500萬養他，對球團來說很划算吧！如果他不接受長約，一年一年靠好表現爭取加薪，六年拿得到的錢很有可能不只3000萬哦！願意接受長約，就是比較重視保障，眼前看得到的先落袋為安。
__________________
================= 我從來不把錢當錢看 我都是把錢當命看！ ================= 所謂理論，就是大家知道為什麼，但實際上行不通 所謂實務，就是沒有人知道為什麼，但實際上行得通 本公司已經完美結合了理論與實務： 什麼都行不通，而且沒有人知道為什麼
|
|
|
2008-01-25, 01:16 PM
#93
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Oct 2003
文章: 89
|
簽到........
|
|
2008-01-25, 01:34 PM
#94
|
|
|
Basic Member
加入日期: Jan 2008 您的住址: 就是那裏阿
文章: 15
|
阿伯說洋基認為投手是消耗品,如果阿民拿長約他會很驚訝...
這是痛痛 後遺症嗎?  |
|
2008-01-25, 01:38 PM
#95
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Oct 2003
文章: 89
|
引用:
應該算是吧，再怎麼有錢的凱子，遇上詐騙集團的老大，一次就夠他終生難忘了... |
|
|
2008-01-25, 01:52 PM
#96
|
|
|
Senior Member
加入日期: Jan 2002 您的住址: 化學毒品添加物王國
文章: 1,215
|
引用:
應該不是, 如果洋基弄得到雙城的 Santana, 你看他簽不簽長約 ~~ Joba Chamberlain 如果今年繼續發光發熱, 相信被洋基綁長約的機會也大 ~~ 小王太反常了, 敢簽長約的心臟要很大 
__________________
You dropped 150 grand on a fucking education you could have got for $1.50 in late charges at the public library. (From: Good Will Hunting) 再好的制度，到人的手上，都會朝最壞的狀況而去。 |
|
|
2008-01-25, 02:14 PM
#97
|
|
|
Senior Member
加入日期: Jan 2002 您的住址: 化學毒品添加物王國
文章: 1,215
|
郵件問答, 灌水用
http://newyork.yankees.mlb.com/news...t=.jsp&c_id=nyy What's all this talk about the Yankees needing a No. 1 starter? Have we forgotten about Chien-Ming Wang? He's won 19 games two years in a row, took a perfect game into the eighth inning and has great poise on the mound. He did have one bad series against Cleveland, but is that enough to say he's not No. 1 material? -- Eric W., Los Angeles That's up to the observer. There are plenty of people out there who insist that Wang is really more of a solid No. 2, despite the 38 victories over the past two seasons. They've used the Cleveland postseason starts as ammunition this offseason, and until Wang gets back on a mound and starts chalking up wins, there's not a whole lot he can do. The results of the AL Cy Young Award balloting, where Wang did not receive even one vote, were surprising. For the purposes of comparisons among "aces," Wang seems to have been hurt by high hit totals and low strikeout ratios. Posada and second baseman Robinson Cano have been among the players who have stepped up and insisted the Yankees need an ace such as the Twins' Johan Santana for 2008. The decision seems to be a split one among the clubhouse, at best. Left-hander Andy Pettitte thinks the Yankees will be just fine as currently comprised, saying last month, "I think Wang is an absolute stud. An ace."
__________________
You dropped 150 grand on a fucking education you could have got for $1.50 in late charges at the public library. (From: Good Will Hunting) 再好的制度，到人的手上，都會朝最壞的狀況而去。 |
|
2008-01-25, 04:48 PM
#98
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Mar 2006 您的住址: Fox River State Penitentiary Joliet,Illinois
文章: 214
|
引用:
|
|
|
2008-01-25, 06:31 PM
#99
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Mar 2006 您的住址: Fox River State Penitentiary Joliet,Illinois
文章: 214
|
引用:
所以如果洋基只能二選一,和Cano 簽長約的可能性比小王大 至於金額,洋基應該會比較保守,不像以前 |
|
|
2008-01-25, 06:44 PM
#100
|
|
