PCDVD數位科技討論區
PCDVD數位科技討論區   註冊 常見問題 標記討論區為已讀

回到   PCDVD數位科技討論區 > 電腦硬體討論群組 > 系統組件
帳戶
密碼
 

  回應
 
主題工具
sxs112.tw
Elite Member
 
sxs112.tw的大頭照
 

加入日期: Aug 2001
文章: 12,393
INTEL單核心0.065製程CPU CedarMill現身??

At the time of some research on the site of INTEL, we fell by chance on a presentation made in December 2004 to financial analysts by the pope process from INTEL, the great Bohr Mark. Mainly intended to explain the process 65nm with the profane shareholders, this pdf, which one can find here, comprises a small surprise on page 25. Indeed, this one is entitled "65 Nm Microprocessor Prototypes Fabricated" and shows the photograph of two dies, a CPU equipped with a single core and a CPU Bi-core, all two engraved in 65 Nm. The Processor of right-hand side is already known since it acts of Yonah whose core was already shown of very near at the time of the IDF. However, no processor engraved in 65 Nm and equipped with only one core was still presented. According to any probability, the die which one sees on the photograph of left is neither more, nor less than the processor known under the name of code of "Cedar Mill", which will succeed Prescott, and will leave in 2006. On the photograph, one clearly sees the two units of executions typical of the core Prescott and a L2 mask of 2 Mb



Even if the photograph is not good quality, we wanted to know some more about this die. With this intention, we recadré a die of Prescott, in 90 Nm, which we superimposed on the die CPU presented per Mark Bohr. After some effects, we obtained this animation:

As it is seen, the core presented here is very close (and it is little to say) to a die shrink of current the core Prescott. Many the blocks of transistors are identical and it east appears obvious that, if this processor is well Cedar Mill, that it will be much closer to Prescott than Prescott was it of Northwood. At all events, if INTEL activates all the functionalities of the core Prescott, no one cannot estimate the profit in performances yet. However, some murmur that Tejas would be back, simply famous in Cedar Mill...

INTEL官方PDF
第二十五頁有圖...

來源
     
      
舊 2005-02-19, 07:56 PM #1
回應時引用此文章
sxs112.tw離線中  
GXroots
Master Member
 
GXroots的大頭照
 

加入日期: Feb 2004
您的住址: 台灣國台北市
文章: 1,743
65奈米製程的漏電問題會比90奈米製程嚴重嗎?
如果沒有克服這顆CPU能好好工作嗎?
 
__________________
類亞希子登場...可是沒有空間可放縮圖...好個爛雅虎奇摩...
Orz..Orz..Orz..Orz..Orz..Orz..Orz..Orz..


タブブラウザ Sleipnir 公式ページ
舊 2005-02-19, 08:06 PM #2
回應時引用此文章
GXroots離線中  
sxs112.tw
Elite Member
 
sxs112.tw的大頭照
 

加入日期: Aug 2001
文章: 12,393
引用:
作者GXroots
65奈米製程的漏電問題會比90奈米製程嚴重嗎?
如果沒有克服這顆CPU能好好工作嗎?


再等看看吧.........兩家公司都要推出新玩具了.....
舊 2005-02-19, 08:09 PM #3
回應時引用此文章
sxs112.tw離線中  
lonban
Regular Member
 

加入日期: Jan 2005
文章: 62
我記得我第一次買CPU是0.18奈米
從0.18到0.13再到0.09
現在都要0.065
看來是越做越小了
希望不要比0.09還多問題
舊 2005-02-19, 08:36 PM #4
回應時引用此文章
lonban離線中  
pilotjay
Power Member
 
pilotjay的大頭照
 

加入日期: Nov 2002
您的住址: 高雄
文章: 626
引用:
作者lonban
我記得我第一次買CPU是0.18奈米
從0.18到0.13再到0.09
現在都要0.065
看來是越做越小了
希望不要比0.09還多問題

你確定你以前買的是0.18奈米的CPU?
__________________

財.色.藝.無德可矣?
舊 2005-02-19, 08:47 PM #5
回應時引用此文章
pilotjay離線中  
mgsuper
Major Member
 

加入日期: May 2003
文章: 244
引用:
作者GXroots
65奈米製程的漏電問題會比90奈米製程嚴重嗎?
如果沒有克服這顆CPU能好好工作嗎?


若電晶體的幾何結構未改變的話,製程愈小,漏電會愈嚴重。(稍有電子學與半導體物理讀過應該就知道我在說啥了吧!)
舊 2005-02-19, 08:51 PM #6
回應時引用此文章
mgsuper離線中  
Arucueid
Master Member
 
Arucueid的大頭照
 

加入日期: Feb 2004
您的住址: 加拿大
文章: 2,391
感覺像是 prescott的加大快取版...

先把SST的漏電問題弄好吧...
__________________

Rule #12: Never date a co-worker.
Rule #13: Never involve lawyers.
Rule #23: Never mess with a Marine's coffee if you want to live!
Rule #51: Sometimes you are wrong

純白の吸血鬼は微笑む:私を殺した責任、とってもらうからわ - アルクエイド ブリュンスッド
貴方に出逢い STAR輝いて アタシが生まれて
Was aus Liebe gethan wird, geschieht immer Jenseits von Gut und Böse - Friedrick Wilhelm Nietzsche

Cain was the first man ever to strike down another... and when the Lord came to him and said ‘What have you done!?’, Cain could not hide his crime. For the voice of his brother’s blood cried out from the very ground

The world has been your battlefield, everywhere you go. The blood of brothers and sons screams out against you. Perhaps you cannot yet hear it, because the soil is not your own, but you will... you will
舊 2005-02-19, 08:52 PM #7
回應時引用此文章
Arucueid離線中  
tzengtw
Advance Member
 

加入日期: Dec 2003
您的住址: 繞著地球跑
文章: 488
引用:
作者mgsuper
若電晶體的幾何結構未改變的話,製程愈小,漏電會愈嚴重。(稍有電子學與半導體物理讀過應該就知道我在說啥了吧!)


不是漏電會愈嚴重吧
是愈不能承受漏電的影響
漏電的程度問題應該不是制程愈小造成
但是製程愈小,如果漏電程度不能跟著降低的話
就會是個大問題
舊 2005-02-19, 09:13 PM #8
回應時引用此文章
tzengtw離線中  
josin
Regular Member
 

加入日期: Dec 2002
文章: 92
Intel 對P1264 可是抱著很大的期待。

如果失敗了,大概也就是半導體時代的結束了。
舊 2005-02-19, 09:30 PM #9
回應時引用此文章
josin離線中  
tzengtw
Advance Member
 

加入日期: Dec 2003
您的住址: 繞著地球跑
文章: 488
引用:
作者josin
Intel 對P1264 可是抱著很大的期待。

如果失敗了,大概也就是半導體時代的結束了。


聽起INTEL好像是半導體之神
舊 2005-02-19, 09:45 PM #10
回應時引用此文章
tzengtw離線中  


    回應


POPIN
主題工具

發表文章規則
不可以發起新主題
不可以回應主題
不可以上傳附加檔案
不可以編輯您的文章

vB 代碼打開
[IMG]代碼打開
HTML代碼關閉



所有的時間均為GMT +8。 現在的時間是01:27 PM.


vBulletin Version 3.0.1
powered_by_vbulletin 2025。