|
||
|
Major Member
 加入日期: Sep 2004
文章: 156
|
這句英文怎麼翻?
原文:
http://www.strategycenter.net/print...b.asp?pubID=112 Not to do so is to invite the otherwise inevitable consequences. 如果不去做,就會招致不可避免的後果 這樣對嗎? |
|||||||
2007-05-05, 09:23 PM
#1
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Dec 2006
文章: 201
|
翻得不錯啊∼....
|
||
|
2007-05-05, 09:43 PM
#2
|
|
|
Junior Member
  
加入日期: Feb 2004 您的住址: 森林裡
文章: 805
|
我的話會翻作:
"如果不這麼做將會招致不可避免的惡果" to do so 一般翻作"這麼做" consequences 一字是稍微帶有警惕性/負面性的"後果"有點像中文的"下場" |
|
2007-05-06, 02:25 AM
#3
|
|
|
Major Member
加入日期: Sep 2004
文章: 156
|
Cruise missile defence remains an underfunded aspect of current US force structure planning, and near term budgetary pressures have seriously compromised the two future US Air Force programs of most value in this critical role, the F-22A Raptor and planned X-band AESA equipped MC2A ISR aircraft. If the US is to have robust capabilities to defeat emerging Third World cruise missile forces, it will need to make an investment in many more F-22A squadrons, and deploy significant numbers of ISR platforms with X-band AESA radars suitable for cruise missile defence operations. Not to do so is to invite the otherwise inevitable consequences.
重點是這段我看不太懂,他說如何要防範第三世界國家的巡弋飛彈 就要比部署F22更花錢,而且要部署數量可觀的先進雷達 如果不這麼做將會招致不可避免的惡果 作者到底是要說什麼? |
|
2007-05-08, 01:24 AM
#4
|
|
|
Major Member
加入日期: Jan 2004 您的住址: 鶯歌火車站
文章: 131
|
引用:
我的解讀是： 要在F22上面加裝更先進的機載雷達， 才能有效的攔阻， 否則美國本土就有很大的機會會被這些國家的巡弋飛彈打爆... 有錯請指正~
__________________
台灣攀岩資料庫 此文章於 2007-05-08 01:41 AM 被 DavW 編輯. |
|
|
2007-05-08, 01:40 AM
#5
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Feb 2007 您的住址: 慾望城市
文章: 2,687
|
引用:
翻譯的很好! |
|
|
2007-05-08, 01:42 AM
#6
|
|
