![]() |
||
*停權中*
加入日期: Mar 2003 您的住址: 米國早安州的熱血台灣人
文章: 2,804
|
這種水冷你敢用嗎?
不是要吐啥!只是不希望大家追大牌
這種水冷你敢用,那算狂少說廢話! ![]() **請點連結看圖**, http://www.dwpg.com/viewimage.php?i.../47587893.pjpeg OPS兄,劣者知道你英文不錯! 好好讀這review吧!還有以下這段話!希望你不會看不懂! 所以THG是啥? BS... Ed. note 1: We have read a few reviews on other sites, and they do not report any problems with the waterblock, nor any mention of noisy pumps. Two of them are ipKonfig.com and Overclockers.com. The unit used in this review will be sent back to Corsair for examination. We will post an update as soon as we know more. ************************************************** From HardOCP: Looking at the Hydrocool 200 objectively, the system needs to have some design flaws addressed before it can be recommended to the performance crowd. The system would greatly benefit from a few minor tweaks but overall the Delphi CPU water block is what holds this system back. The “Microchannel Surface Technology”, while great in theory, falls short in many ways. Poor construction, less than stellar performance and a design that prevents any form of maintenance just isn’t acceptable. In the grand scheme of things, I would like to see Delphi put out another revision of this block that remedies problems we have outlined in this review. Quality control can easily address the concave mating surface of the block that should drastically improve the system’s cooling ability. Still though, you have to question the quality control of the manufacturing company that cannot machine something flat. .... At this point, I think it may be wise to give Corsair a chance to nurture this new relationship with Delphi, work out the kinks and look into a revised version of the Hydrocool line of stand alone water cooling units. Maybe something along the lines of the Hydrocool 300 will earn a recommendation from us; unfortunately we simply cannot recommend this unit to anyone at this time. 我不知道說像這樣的評論與實測,還有人會砸錢下去?錢多嗎?拿點出來做社會公益! ![]() 至少HardOCP比THG誠實多了! |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Mar 2003 您的住址: 米國早安州的熱血台灣人
文章: 2,804
|
拍謝!
![]() 本來是要編刪的..弄錯了.. ![]() 不過也好!怕有些人讀review都只看圖表! 媒體報導如果不實,真的會害死很多人 |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Golden Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Oct 2001 您的住址: 秘密
文章: 2,604
|
看不懂英文
但是看圖說故事..... 是底部不平嗎?? 太糟糕了吧.......這是最基本的說..... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Master Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Sep 2001 您的住址: taiwan
文章: 1,691
|
看沒
可以再說明白一點點嗎? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Major Member
![]() 加入日期: Dec 2002 您的住址: 台中
文章: 114
|
那套水冷系統之前看過某站測試報告印象中好像不是很好...
而那張圖的水冷頭接觸情形,小弟覺得有一大半是intel要負責任的,因為他上面的那個金屬蓋本身就不是很平了,尤其是邊邊的地方特別"凸"出,所以intel會在原廠散熱器底部加上鋁底的石墨貼片,讓中間也能貼到散熱器。而那家水冷製造商則疏忽了這點。 |
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Mar 2003 您的住址: 米國早安州的熱血台灣人
文章: 2,804
|
引用:
Ducati兄安安 ![]() 不會吧?... 請看這句: "Quality control can easily address the concave mating surface of the block that should drastically improve the system’s cooling ability." 這是根據測試者所觀察的結論,就是水冷頭本身不平! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Master Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Sep 2001 您的住址: taiwan
文章: 1,691
|
引用:
喔 了解 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Golden Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Sep 2001
文章: 3,289
|
商業文章本來就速不能盡信~~,如果寫不好,不是就失去一個****主了嗎?
如果是大廠,難免會出現一些瑕疵品,看圖其實我也看不出個所以然,因為沒用水平尺去比block底部,到底是如何不平也不知道,不過馬達噪音... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Mar 2003 您的住址: 米國早安州的熱血台灣人
文章: 2,804
|
引用:
悠大好說了! ![]() 噪音不算啥!都有心玩了..這絕對難不倒! 倒是像加工後處理的問題沒做好才是致命傷! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Apr 2003
文章: 1,011
|
噪音這一點,在THG's review倒是不難看出,
水冷頭部分,或許有些媒體拿到的品質較好吧! 就像Intel P4 ES(工程版)有的極耐超,有的甚至會出現ERROR… 或許THG向Corsair拿了太多記憶體,故僅做"正面"的報導來回禮。 ![]() 感謝狂大告知此情況! |
![]() |
![]() |