華碩 開始放"煙幕彈"啦??
明明就是 PAT....還搞個 Hyper Path.....中文譯名還跟 TOM那裡翻譯 PAT 的那麼接近..........我來幫它掰算了....Hyper Path 光速記憶體定址模式 (炫吧!!)

大家沒必要如此仇視台灣自家的電腦廠商吧，若非華碩願意嘗試打頭陣，其他廠商願意跟進釋出PAT嗎？如果台灣廠商都是礙於intel的***威悶不坑聲把晶片組原有的功能給暗坑掉，這樣user會比較高興！？

對於865G/PE，相信廠商也有跟intel之間作過某種程度的協定，不然875也沒有賣相的優勢存在，所以今天台灣主機板廠商改個名給865G/PE弄個PAT只是遵循規則的遊戲之下的一種trick，這樣不是user跟廠商都雙贏嗎？

光速記憶體定址?不會是Nvidia LMA(Lightspeed Memory Addressing)吧

請問華碩說的那個技術也就是大家口中的PAT∼在P4P800上要如何讓他開啟運作勒？
周邊需要啥條件ㄋ？

不管如何~
還是要為台灣廠商加油啦!!

雖然現在效忠AMD
AMD真是窮人的好朋友

又對上了
http://www.gzeasy.com/itnewsdetail.asp?nID=10155
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9988
怎麼看都像一場戲.........
Intel 越來越像 "邢素蘭"了 自導自演自拍自吹自唱自擂
夠了真是 真是夠了
PS. 別跟"狂老"說"邢素蘭"訴誰..




Intel warns vendors not to overclock 865 chipsets

Takes firm stance on PAT Canterwood lookalikes


By Mike Magee: 星期五 13 六月 2003, 07:52

CHIP FIRM INTEL warned that system manufacturers and users that attempt to overclock 865 chipsets using PAT (performance acceleration technology) may end up with systems that are not under warranty.
The stern warning sends out a clear challenge from Intel to motherboard makers including Asus, Epox, Abit and others that introducing a BIOS to enable elements of 875 technology in 865 chipsets is meeting strong disapproval from the chip giant.

(See BIOS update will convert Intel 865 boards to Canterwood 875 and Intel's PAT more like a turbot than a turbo.)

Intel is also warning users from buying such products.

A representative from Intel in Santa Clara said: "Intel does not condone over-clocking, and users and/or system manufacturers that employ over-clocking may void their Intel chipset warrantees and subsequently, any failures associated to an over-clocked Intel chipset may be the sole responsibility of the user or system manufacturer".

He continued: "With the 875P chipset, the internal signals, including PAT capabilities, are being run as designed, tested and validated by Intel, and this results in a very robust platform across silicon & board skew and all specified temperature ranges".

The representative also went into details of how Intel positioned PAT. He said it offered a "robust way" to implement high performance features without compromising the integrity of Intel chipset and processor based platforms.

PAT, he said, includes performance enhancements in the 875P chipset design, as well as making sure that every 875P chipset that ships from Intel is fully tested and validated to work as designed over the entire specified operating range, which includes the provisions for silicon skew, temperature & motherboard skew.

But, he said: "So-called 'PAT implementations' provided by a group of vendors on their platforms using Intel 865PE chipsets" do not conform to those standards set by his firm.

"This test and validation criteria is not conducted by Intel for the 865PE chipset and the platform quality and reliability concerning these PAT implementations should be called into question".

He said: "Intel has procured some of these 865PE chipset-based motherboard products that are claiming to enable PAT, and our initial observations indicate these platforms exhibit instability and in some cases actual failure".

That, he added is because the 865PE chipsets are being "tricked" into a non specified and non validated operating mode.

"In the cases that Intel has observed, certain internal data paths and signals are being run at up to 50% above their specified operating range, which can lead to external interface marginality - this is commonly referred to as "over-clocking" .

He adds: "To be clear, the performance increase achieved by these platforms is the result of over-clocking and other non-compliant usage, and users of these platforms are not receiving the benefits of 875P chipset-based platforms with PAT functionality".

To us, this seems the clearest possible warning that Intel is set on taking on the motherboard makers who will offer the BIOS. µ



其實弟覺得INTEL 哪管晶片組誰賣的好

有哪個企業用戶會省那區區3000多元新台幣去買865 啟動PAT 然後提心吊膽的
又有哪些家庭使用者為了那區區的3%記憶體效能去買875 啟動 PAT 看爽的
.............................................................................................

P4 賣的最好啦 免費的****一堆.............
不用在 YES! Intel 了
現在都在打 "神奇腦"的****


AMD阿.....求求你阿.....爭氣一點 .....時脈在衝阿
好歹弟家裡的AMDCPU 比 INTEL CPU 多阿

我沒有仇視"華碩" 事實上對它的印象還不錯,之前一台K6-200的電腦用的是華碩主機板,竟然到現在還活的好好的(尤其兩年多前那時候還不知道什麼叫"優質POWER"一直都是餵它路邊牌250W...整個設備線路也都未整理...線路滿滿滿...散熱絕對差到極點.....在如此惡劣的環境下...華碩主機板..K6-200 麗台顯示卡 Voodoo2代 火球硬碟.......都整顆好好的...唯一掛的只有記憶體 256MB變成 128MB....
我認為華碩放煙幕彈,是認為它既然就開啟了...也就別掰了...如果停用..就乖乖停吧...因為照目前一些大大的測試看來,的確不是每片在開啟PAT之後都能正常無誤的運作.....就算能夠正常運作,誰知道長期累積下來會不會對"晶片組"本身的穩定性造成傷害.....雖然"華碩"是間正派肯負責的大公司....不過善後維修對消費者本身還是有所不便之處不是嗎

真是他x弟 Intel，又來搞這一套..
就算真的開了PAT會不穩，我還是要有此功能...
起碼在測極限的時候才會感覺到錢花在哪裡..

啊哈哈哈哈
我喜歡這對句

反正Asus目前的形象就是：省料,價高,偏偏比人穩比人快..... (大部分啦 XD)
其他廠商應該恨的牙癢癢吧?

無疑又幫Asus造勢就是了