感謝分享：
4/12 Canterwood即將率先登場，Springdale則將於五月與P4 3.2G 800隨後報到
由數據來看SIS655輸在外頻只有FSB533，而SIS655還小贏FSB800但只搭配DDR333的875，所以除了提高DDR時脈之外，FSB的大幅提升才是關鍵！但以Canterwood的價格(超貴)和定位(工作站)，效能領先群雄也是應該的！

今天入手了ASUS P4SDX，當然北橋是B0版的，剛剛小試了一下，外頻初步可以穩定跑180(SIS終於也可以把外頻超越170了)，還在逐步拉高外頻當中，不過200外頻還是無法達成，但已經超越其他SIS655的板子了！

忘了引述他裡面講的一句話
We've recieved a couple of Canterwood boards and here's a little something for you guys. The graphs show a comparison using 3 GHz speed for the CPU. First, you have a 3.06GHz (23x133) CPU on the 845PE chipset at DDR333. Next you have the unlocked P4 running at 200MHz x 15 for 3GHz on the 845PE.
We then have the SiS 655 chipset at 3.06GHz (23x133) with Dual DDR400. Finally, we have the Canterwood at Dual DDR333 with the 3.06GHz CPU (23x133) and some Dual DDR400 action at 15x200.

Except for the last Canterwood benchmarks at 200MHz FSB, memory was set to 2.0-5-2-2 on all other tests. The Canterwood was a little unstable at 200MHz and had to be benched at 2.5-6-2-2.