接下來看看P4和K7在3D Mark的比較表:
FX5900U(450/850) P4 3.6G Barton 2.5G
3D MARK2001SE Score 19442 19176
GAME1-low detail 280.4fps 272.9fps
GAME1-high detail 91fps 94.3fps
GAME2-low detail 351.5fps 348.4fps
GAME2-high detail 186.7fps 185.3fps
GAME3-low detail 249.3fps 241.9fps
GAME3-high detail 112.4fps 109.1fps
GAME4 141.4fps 138.5fps
Fill Rate-single 1666 Mtexels/s 1666 Mtexels/s
Fill Rate-multi 3266.5 Mtexels/s 3050 Mtexels/s
High Polygon-1 light 104.3Mtriamgles/s 95.1 Mtriamgles/s
High Polygon-8 light 28.1Mtriamgles/s 28.1Mtriamgles/s
Environment Bump Mapping 192.2fps 214.6fps
DOT3 Bump Mapping 297.1fps 297.2fps
Vertx Shader 176.1fps 176.1fps
Pixel Shader 208.1fps 207fps
Advanced Pixel Shader 119fps 118.5fps
Point Sprites 41 MSprites/s 41 MSprites/s

劣者先發表一下個人的看法
首先K7在3D效能的表現上實在是令人激賞!!
憑著只有P4一半的售價,卻能達到97%的效能
就劣者個人的經驗看,若Barton可以超上2.6G的話
在3D效能上和P4 3.6G平起平坐該無問題
P4必須要在時脈上領先Barton達1G以上,才會有明顯的效能優勢出現
對一般沒有做龐大影像處理的網友而言,K7實在就很夠用了...........
所以即使是K7玩家,也是能把高階的顯示卡餵得飽飽的喲!!!