We've taken the time to compare the regular collector's edition (reviewed above) with the DTS audio version, and some of you are going to be a little surprised. Usually, we tend to prefer the DTS audio versions of our favorite DVDs, but not in this case. The DTS track does deliver the usual improvements in resolution. These include a bigger, wider soundstage, with greater clarity and more natural rendition of atmosphere. Panning is smoother and music and dialogue seem to come alive. But the big problem with this track is a decided lack of low frequency. I've heard a lot of others complaining about this on the newsgroups, and I can only agree. When I listened to this film in DTS sound in the theaters, I could actually feel the bass in my chest. No one expects quite that same sensation in the living room, but I was surprised that there was so little low frequency as to be actually distracting. The Dolby Digital version of this disc resonates with bass - not so the DTS. Some audio buffs have actually measured the audio encoded on the disc, and found that there IS substantial low frequency in the mix, so it may be a factor of the way your DTS processor is handling it. Be that as it may, I'm not experiencing it... and neither are most others. This was the first DTS film in theaters and I wanted to be blown away with the DTS sound on DVD. I wasn't. Add to that the fact that the addition of the DTS track meant the removal of virtually all substantial bonus material other than the making-of documentary and... well, our recommendation is to buy the Dolby Digital version.
看完這篇文章，我想說的是這篇原文作者認為最大的問題是低頻不足，他所引述的論證幾乎皆來自網路上其他新聞討論群組，在文中他承認在電影院觀賞這部影片時，它的
BASS令他感到震撼，只是在家中感受不到低頻的震撼音效。這應該說明一點就是影片本身的音效已達到某種水準，所差別的應是他自己所擁有的器材設備，空間、隔音
....等等。再者他又提到一些音效愛好者，曾經真正去測量過這片影片的音效編碼，發現它真的低頻不足，但是
他們卻沒有告訴我們他們所使用的測量器材是什麼，怎麼個測法。說了這麼多，其實只是一句話，以訛傳訛，人云亦云，大家有興趣，不仿拿這兩片自己比較一下，或許你也會變成DTS的支持者。