To chonglin:
那我真的被dvdangle的評論者騙了嗎?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
是嗎?那你去底下這個網站再看看,reviwer建議買AC3
不管買DTS版orAC都好,反正主要是看電影,
真的要比音效,咱們電影院見....
http://www.thedigitalbits.com/reviews/jurassicpark.html
--------------------------------------------
[節錄]
We've taken the time to compare the regular collector's edition (reviewed above) with the DTS audio version, and some of you are going to be a little surprised. Usually, we tend to prefer the DTS audio versions of our favorite DVDs, but not in this case. The DTS track does deliver the usual improvements in resolution. These include a bigger, wider soundstage, with greater clarity and more natural rendition of atmosphere. Panning is smoother and music and dialogue seem to come alive. But the big problem with this track is a decided lack of low frequency. I've heard a lot of others complaining about this on the newsgroups, and I can only agree. When I listened to this film in DTS sound in the theaters, I could actually feel the bass in my chest. No one expects quite that same sensation in the living room, but I was surprised that there was so little low frequency as to be actually distracting. The Dolby Digital version of this disc resonates with bass - not so the DTS. Some audio buffs have actually measured the audio encoded on the disc, and found that there IS substantial low frequency in the mix, so it may be a factor of the way your DTS processor is handling it. Be that as it may, I'm not experiencing it... and neither are most others. This was the first DTS film in theaters and I wanted to be blown away with the DTS sound on DVD. I wasn't. Add to that the fact that the addition of the DTS track meant the removal of virtually all substantial bonus material other than the making-of documentary and... well, our recommendation is to buy the Dolby Digital version.


[這篇文章曾被 isseymiyake 重新修正編輯過 (時間 12-01-2000).]