|
Power Member
|
引用:
Originally posted by Mechaome
恕刪…
以小說來看,第一本和後面兩三本,敘事架構原本就不盡相同,
所以電影版的三部曲,略有不同的架構也是很合理的.
|
所以我強調的是風格ㄚ
記得我前一篇也有提過PJ電影版時間軸的考量 
引用:
Originally posted by Mechaome
另外,扥爾金寫的是一本魔戒沒錯,但其中本來就是分為三大章節啊!
不論是美國原出版商或台灣的出版商,都是用三本的方式來出書,
畢竟若硬要合成一本,實在太厚了...
|
首部曲Bonus DVD（應該是吧 ）有提到
Tolkien對出版商分隔成三本很不高興
引用:
Originally posted by Mechaome
另外,導演彼得傑克森當初在拍攝時,原電影公司只準備拍兩集,
但因為拍到第二部時,發覺兩集根本塞不下,最後是換了新線公司才花更多錢拍了三集.
|
http://www.theonering.net/perl/newsview/7/1005588518
Miramax or Newline, apparently when Peter began his quest to find a backer Miramax stepped up but after a short time it was clear they were looking for a single film & told Peter how to go about this, now at the time Mr Jackson had envisaged the Tome in 2 parts & all credit to him he declined & the they went their separate ways.
Newline then entered the room & to Peter’s surprise they offered a three film deal the rest is history, I feel Miramax may sack lynch someone for being a little narrow minded!
這裡有提到PJ找新線與米拉麥當金主
米拉麥只肯答應拍「一部」，但PJ已將劇本寫成「兩部」
此時新線跳出來提供了「三部」電影的資金
（這一段在某個幕後製作紀錄片裡有談到）
引用:
Originally posted by Mechaome
至於你說用反推來看腳本刪最多的是哪一部,我還是不懂如何看出來?
基本上當初在擬腳本時,應該是把書的三大章一起濃縮,而不是僅針對其中一部吧!
|
都說了是題外話了
大哥您不必對此這麼敏感吧
__________________
幾年來…轉變還真是大…………
|