瀏覽單個文章
oversky
*停權中*
 

加入日期: Jan 2002
文章: 127
和 Groklaw 在法庭現場觀察的情勢相反。


http://bit.ly/VBTtvA

We have our first report from the US District Court in San Jose, CA,

And it appears from our report that the media may be overplaying somewhat that Samsung said peace was up to Apple, that the ball was in Apple's court, as if Samsung is ready to settle. I see nothing to corroborate that yet in our reporter's notes. What they actually said was a lot sharper, with the meaning intended to be that Apple is the problem. Samsung accused Apple of going to Samsung's suppliers after the jury verdict and scaring them by claiming the verdict meant they couldn't sell the affected Samsung products any more. It's the judge, the Hon. Lucy Koh, who really wants the parties to settle this. But there was no settlement.
舊 2012-12-07, 10:44 PM #658
回應時引用此文章
oversky離線中