瀏覽單個文章
oversky
*停權中*
 

加入日期: Jan 2002
文章: 127
引用:
作者oversky
http://bit.ly/Qa195u
Apple also noted that Park herself said that none of Samsung's accused models were based on the F700 her team had developed.

大概是這段話所以 F700 才沒有被列入本案的先前技藝。
以滑蓋鍵盤的觀點來看,這句話是沒錯。
但是就像我前面講的,合起來的造型要怎麼算?
如果滑蓋就不算一樣,那有電池蓋是不是也算不一樣?


http://cnet.co/Qa7f5W
Apple has argued that her testimony isn't relevant because she didn't design any of the products it says copied the iPhone's look and feel. Apple noted that Park herself wasn't aware of any of the Samsung phones being based on the F700.

和前面的文章說法稍有不同。如果只是 wasn't aware of ,那三星其它手機的設計師也可以說不是根據 iphone 。事實上,三星的確在 iphone 發表前就擁有這個造型設計,F700 的設計師應該沒資格替三星其它手機設計師說是怎麼設計的 。
舊 2012-09-06, 10:59 AM #504
回應時引用此文章
oversky離線中