引用:
|
作者oversky
話雖如此， F700 並沒有被列入本案的先前技藝。
Apple argues against Samsung using the F700 as evidence, judge agrees
http://bit.ly/RNixb8
我還沒弄清楚為什麼？
不知如果再審還有沒有機會再列入先前技藝？ |
http://bit.ly/Qa195u
Apple also noted that Park herself said that none of Samsung's accused models were based on the F700 her team had developed.
大概是這段話所以 F700 才沒有被列入本案的先前技藝。
以滑蓋鍵盤的觀點來看，這句話是沒錯。
但是就像我前面講的，合起來的造型要怎麼算？
如果滑蓋就不算一樣，那有電池蓋是不是也算不一樣？