引用:
|
作者A級黑豬肉
妳一定沒看判決的內容。
這次判決會偏 Apple，很大的原因是三星在 Apple 出來後馬上改設計，以及 Google 甚至寄信給三星說不要抄 Apple 的但是三星還是不管。
所以我看這次的判決是剛好而已。三星活該。
這個螢幕，要是沒記錯是 LG 的，不是三爽。
|
好戲還沒演完呢。
陪審團被發現很多項重大缺失。
http://bit.ly/OrizbR
http://bit.ly/OriCEz
1. 陪審團根本沒有讀完 109 頁的 jury instructions。
陪審團主席說陪償金額要讓三星很痛，但要合理。
Hogan said. "We wanted to make sure it was sufficiently high to be painful, but not unreasonable."
可是 jury instructions 裏就寫著賠償主旨是補償損失，
而不是在懲罰。
the damages you award are meant to compensate the patent holder and not to punish an infringer.
2. 有一位陪審團員說為了快點達到結論，所以他們跳過先前技藝 (prior art) 的考量。
'After we debated that first patent — what was prior art — because we had a hard time believing there was no prior art, that there wasn't something out there before Apple. In fact we skipped that one so we could go on faster. It was bogging us down.'