引用:
作者Zuchen
我看x-bit的說明是這樣:
The 3D load was created by means of the first SM3.0/HDR test from 3DMark06 running in a loop at 1600x1200 with 4x FSAA and 16x AF. The Peak 2D mode was emulated by means of the 2D Transparent Windows test from PCMark05.
在3DMark之下的確並不一定能達到最大功耗,而且他是取平均值
不過這數據還是有參考意義
畢竟玩遊戲時也並非總是100%在跑
那如果要找到最大耗電/溫度應該就是用FurMark吧?
FurMark我試過Burning和Extreme Burning
兩種模式差距似乎不大(最高溫只差一度)
|
我對句中的"means"的解讀是"方法",因為一樣測試只會有一個"mean(平均值)",
還是說我沒翻譯錯,只是x-bit 取的是功耗平均值?
極限功耗會和x-bit的peak 3D差多呢?