引用:
|
作者EIGHTS
王建民
BMI 值 : 28.53 (H:190/W:103)
連勝文
BMI 值 : 26.6 (H:194/W:100)
連勝文還比較瘦咧
主觀的觀點影響你的評價
有什麼話好說??
如果聽不懂什麼叫比喻
就不用來討論了
Cudacke 版友如果還是不能回歸我在討論的主題
我也不會再跟你口水了,無聊 
|
運動員跟一般人的計算方式是不會一樣的...
原來你的人生經歷... 連這點都不知道喔.......
難怪你電影看不懂的東西還真多.
幫你一把,
資料幫你查, 英文你自己看喔!
偶知道你水平低, 所以順便幫你標一下重點, 你好好慢慢的看.
"Despite this, BMI categories are regularly regarded as a satisfactory tool for measuring whether sedentary individuals are "underweight," "overweight" or "obese" with various qualifications, such as: Individuals who are not sedentary being exempt - athletes, children, the elderly, the infirm, and individuals who are naturally endomorphic or ectomorphic (i.e., people who don't have a medium frame).
One basic problem, especially in athletes, is that muscle is denser than fat. Some professional athletes are "overweight" or "obese" according to their BMI - unless the number at which they are considered "overweight" or "obese" is adjusted upward in some modified version of the calculation. In children and the elderly, differences in bone density and, thus, in the proportion of bone to total weight can mean the number at which these people are considered underweight should be adjusted downward."
(
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_mass_index)
阿就跟你說了王建民好歹是全世界最高等棒球聯盟裡面的明星投手,
運動員的計算方式跟一般人不一樣的,
早就說了你不會分肥肉跟肌肉,
好一點可以秤 BMI 的秤都還有分運動員跟一般人,
你不懂的東西就不要亂扯了啦.
還 BMI 呢,
就會糊扯, 跟你那平衡度不好,
思緒就已經四分五裂, 沒有整體性, 所以主題的評論一樣,
你真能針對主題討論,
就不用在這邊跟偶扯王建民, 連勝文的東西,
然後糊扯還被偶抓包啦!