引用:
|
作者dragonfly
結語好像是說:AMD的idle time 較省電，而Most office or multimedia PCs typically spend most of their time running idle or almost idle, which explains AMD's dominance, even with an aged 90 nm processor.
所以結論還是amd較省，也解釋了AMD's dominance, even with an aged 90 nm processor.
|
其實我看不太懂，他的說明不十分清楚
上面那張圖是standby/load找到的瞬間最大值？
下面那張圖應該是60/90分鐘的積分值
這樣看來65nm的Athlon64x2會比Core2省更多電
發熱量也更低才是
這也算是AMD在效能測試全面潰散時，一點小小安慰吧