瀏覽單個文章
Ed.
Master Member
 
Ed.的大頭照
 

加入日期: Dec 2000
您的住址: 台北市
文章: 2,085
原本應該將《紐約時報》的原文全部轉載過來以為佐證,但過期新聞似乎是要會員才能看,只有將其他地方轉述部份的貼出作參考:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0319262/news
NASA Orders Scientists Not To Discuss Global-Warming Movie
26 April 2004 (StudioBriefing)
NASA scientists and officials were officially ordered early this month not to comment on the upcoming movie The Day After Tomorrow, which raises the prospect of an instant ice age occurring as a result of global warming, the New York Times reported Sunday. "No one from NASA is to do interviews or otherwise comment on anything having to do with" the film, said the message, which was signed by the top press officer of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, MD. "Any news media wanting to discuss science fiction vs. science fact about climate change will need to seek comment from individuals or organizations not associated with NASA." The Times reported that it had received a copy of the message from an unnamed NASA scientist who said he resented efforts to muzzle researchers. The newspaper indicated that late last week the agency reversed its decision and said that it would make scientists available to discuss the movie.

這是紐約時報原文的標題與連結,有會員資格的請參考,若可能請代為轉載過來,謝謝:
NATIONAL | April 25, 2004
NASA Curbs Comments on Ice Age Disaster Movie
By ANDREW C. REVKIN (NYT) News

希望前面提出質疑的,最好能再針對上文內容提出看法。
__________________
*****我始終反對戰爭,除非為了和平的緣故--格蘭特*****

Miss July: I'm the girl. Why do I have to carry everything?
Steven: I support Women's Lib. don't you?


台灣新文化紀念館 96.10.18~96.12.25

台北市寧夏路89號大同分局3樓
舊 2004-05-02, 10:55 AM #14
回應時引用此文章
Ed.離線中