多謝政府立案兄的熱心響應. 各位不難看出Prime95的測試非常穩定, 相同組態設定下輸出誤差非常小, 更重要的是它的精確度不錯, 相信今後在比較兩個相近似的系統時亦能方便快速地分辨出效能高低, 更不會再有那種用肉眼看都知道孰高孰低但測出 (用Super PI) 卻是相反的烏龍現象.

以下是弟的測試結果:
Compare your results to other computers at http://www.mersenne.org/bench.htm
That web page also contains instructions on how your results can be included.

Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz
CPU speed: 4129.22 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 8 KB
L2 cache size: 512 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 128 bytes
TLBS: 64
Prime95 version 23.8, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 8.592 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 10.207 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 11.574 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 13.925 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 16.954 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 20.122 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 22.526 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 29.505 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 36.313 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 43.259 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 48.793 ms.