瀏覽單個文章
jeff641125
Golden Member
 
jeff641125的大頭照
 

加入日期: Apr 2002
您的住址: 台灣屏東
文章: 2,563
引用:
Originally posted by JJA_XX
dvdsir兄的疑惑是沒錯,
當新法出現時,在無判例的情形下,
大家會覺得無所適從。

但是,在法律有大幅翻修的情形下,
TIPO都會有人會和法官上課(或溝通)...
所以小弟覺得對於新法的官方說法是會影響法官往後的判決,
而且官方說法說的越清楚越好,
所以大家就盡量問TIPO,
最好是讓他們整理出一份針對網路購物(含任何著作物)的適法性說明,
正式公布於網頁上
這樣的憑據也會比各自mail或打電話來的有效...

這樣想...不知道各位會不會覺得太樂觀呢?


當然如果TIPO對法官的溝通做的好的話...當然是最好啦...
也希望它能夠將詳細的說明公佈出來...這才不會讓大家無所適從...
不過我還是跟dvdsir有同樣的看法
TIPO的官方說法不一定是法官審判時的說法
就算它公佈了...法官就會跟著走嗎???
反正在現在情況尚未明朗下...大家還是要小心行事囉!!
__________________
Money
It can buy a House ,But not a Home
It can buy a Bed,But not Sleep
It can buy a Clock,But not Time
It can buy you a Book,But not Knowledge
It can buy you a Position,But not Respect
It can buy you Medicine,But not Health
It can buy you Blood,But not Life


So you see money isn't everything.
I tell you all this because I am your Friend,
and as your Friend I want to take away your pain and suffering.....
so send me all your money and I will suffer for you.
A truer Friend than me you will never find.


CASH ONLY PLEASE
舊 2003-07-31, 10:06 AM #79
回應時引用此文章
jeff641125離線中