|
Elite Member
|
引用:
Originally posted by HardCorr
The internal cache sizes in RV350 are reduced from R300, which is probably why there is a reasonably large disparity between the 9600 PRO and 9500 PRO with 6X FSAA enabled.
R300的內建快取記憶容量在RV350時被減少, 所以在6XFSAA時R9500Pro跟R9500Pro有很大的差距
Both 4X and 2X AA show the 9600 PRO very close in performance to the 9500 PRO, up until 1600x1200 where we see the now characteristic fill-rate performance drop off.
在 4X 跟2X AA 時 R9600Pro 跟 R9500Pro 的效能很相近, 不過在 1600 X 1200時我們可以看到特有的填充率效能減弱 (最後一句比較奇怪)
所以不只是填充率低... 內建快取記憶體也比較少 (像P4 vs Celery?)
|
sorry漏了那一句，cache這方面我就真的是不懂了  |