瀏覽單個文章
orinsinal
Master Member
 
orinsinal的大頭照
 

加入日期: Feb 2002
您的住址: Taipei
文章: 1,611
引用:
Originally posted by Ibiza

Can't you see that it although might be a bug (I never say it could never be), but during this time of the hot debate of the 3DMark03 cheating, the render prob. of 3DMark2001 SE might be bit of "suspicious", "doubtable". That's it.
While the spotlight is on the 3DMark03 issue now,
a new doubt has emerged. This will only make NV and its new Detonator FX even more questionable.
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/sho...?threadid=12339
http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6038

我也認為44.03是一個爭議性的驅動程式,貴樣拿2K1消失的飛龍來
對照44.03其他等降低精度的取樣方式增進分數,所以我回覆你的首
篇文章不就在於3DMark2K1 GT2飛龍的上面嗎?因為我自己測過2K1
並沒有發現這類情況。

之後又有mydrivers.com的評論,所以我認為這可能是作業系統相容性
等問題,而不是nVidia如在2k3上的取巧。

這兩者是不同輕重的事情,相容性問題Bug沒什麼好爭議的,畢竟這不是
常態,更無論作弊。在一切未明朗前只能相信既有一定可信度的資訊,不
知道貴樣是在硬凹什麼?還是看對方的文章有看沒有懂?
舊 2003-05-26, 02:56 AM #50
回應時引用此文章
orinsinal離線中