|
PCDVD數位科技討論區
(https://www.pcdvd.com.tw/index.php)
- 七嘴八舌異言堂
(https://www.pcdvd.com.tw/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
- - iPhone 5 CPU跑分超越所有Android裝置！
(https://www.pcdvd.com.tw/showthread.php?t=983919)
|
|---|
引用:
路人？呵呵呵呵呵 裡面還出現John Corbett... |
反正這測試不就正好是提供果"粉"慰慰的好題材,就這樣,高興就好!
乾脆拿水面艦跟潛艦比看誰可以下潛比較深,反正都是船,所以可以比...哈哈哈 昨天還有人貼上fb,順便把S3踩在腳下批評,也滿有才的. 蘋果用戶當然也有很多理性的支持者,不過我遇到的不多就是,大多數都是粉類的. |
引用:
其實是，酸果粉比較需要安慰， 再怎麼酸，結果還是很多人要， 只好再更「酸」了！ |
引用:
應該不會有人把那個影片當真吧 :shock: :shock: :shock: 不過我也可以問還是當真的都是 Android 粉？ :laugh: :laugh: |
引用:
往樓上看看杯， 當真的還真不少 :unbelief: |
引用:
那不是自動亮度調整, 那是 application override 的亮度設定. 只有開 browser 亮度會突然變暗. 這也算另一種作弊方式. 白色環境下 AMOLED 非常耗電. 有很多網頁都是白色背景居多 很多評測網站跑script 測 web browsing time. 三爽刻意降低暗度 來增長電池評測時間. 老實講算是作弊, 測 web browsing time 應該要每個機種都固定相同的面積亮度來測... 至於 AMOLED 耗電量 應該相對於 TFT LCD 來說 各有消長... 白色 高亮度下的AMOLED 發光效率事實上比 LED backlit + LCD 低好幾倍... 所以一概而論的說AMOLED 耗電量比 LCD 低 也不見公允. |
引用:
乾，我當真了 :cry: 那我要算什麼粉，米粉還是河粉？ :hungry: |
引用:
所以就用上面網友貼的圖最清楚吧 而且我也不是有一概而論的意思, 我想你是誤解了 :shock: |
引用:
http://www.displaymate.com/OLED_Gal..._ShootOut_1.htm OLED Galaxy S III and iPhone LCD Power Efficiency Comparisons: Typical full screen text applications (on a white background) have an Average Picture Level APL of 90 percent or more, so we expect LCDs to do better. On the other hand, typical full screen video and photographic images have an APL of 20 percent or less, so we expect OLEDs to do better there. From our Luminance, Power, and screen Area measurements we can determine exactly which is better, when, and by how much. Comparing the Galaxy S III and the iPhone 4, images with less than 28 percent APL are more power efficient on the Galaxy S III, and greater than 28 percent are more efficient on the iPhone 4 – so the Galaxy S III is somewhat more efficient for videos and significantly less efficient for text applications. But the iPhone 4 uses an LCD with Low Temperature Poly Silicon that is significantly more efficient than typical LCDs with amorphous Silicon, such as the iPhone 3GS – where the crossover is a lot higher at 69 percent APL, so it’s a split decision there depending on the application mix… 基本上iPhone 4 的LPTS LCD + LED backlit 在 APL (Average Picture Level) 28%以上的圖像就比 Samsung Galaxy S3 的 AMOLED 還要 power efficient. 在全白螢幕下 Running Time on Battery 測試部分 差距更大. For comparison, note that the iPhone 4 has a running time of 7.8 hours with a screen Brightness of 541 cd/m2 while the Galaxy S III has a running time of 5.6 hours with a screen Brightness of 224 cd/m2. |
新的評測出來了 iPhone 5 vs Galaxy SIII vs iPhone 4
http://www.displaymate.com/Smartphone_ShootOut_2.htm iPhone 5 的IPS LCD 不管是顏色, 亮度, 環境光反射, 平均電源效率 都比Galaxy SIII 的Super AMOLED HD 好太多... |
| 所有的時間均為GMT +8。 現在的時間是01:18 PM. |
vBulletin Version 3.0.1
powered_by_vbulletin 2025。