PCDVD數位科技討論區

PCDVD數位科技討論區 (https://www.pcdvd.com.tw/index.php)
-   效能極限 (https://www.pcdvd.com.tw/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   用Prime95來測試電腦的效能 (https://www.pcdvd.com.tw/showthread.php?t=285326)

yunono 2004-01-03 02:51 PM

小弟用了2台試了一下....看來這個程式偏愛INTEL喔
*****AMD XP2400+(512DDR RAM)*****
AMD Athlon(tm) Processor
CPU speed: 2000.34 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE
L1 cache size: 64 KB
L2 cache size: 256 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
L1 TLBS: 32
L2 TLBS: 256
Prime95 version 23.7, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 37.259 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 43.673 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 46.876 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 59.976 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 72.238 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 86.463 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 97.448 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 133.478 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 156.167 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 198.470 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 227.832 ms.

*****Celeron 2.0GHz(256DDR RAM)*****
Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.00GHz
CPU speed: 1992.01 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 8 KB
L2 cache size: 128 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 128 bytes
TLBS: 64
Prime95 version 23.7, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 25.348 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 32.006 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 40.263 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 42.155 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 52.723 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 60.174 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 67.737 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 100.652 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 126.282 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 162.147 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 190.859 ms.

這只能說...太神奇了
:confused: :confused:

Barracuda 2004-01-03 04:23 PM

引用:
Originally posted by yunono
小弟用了2台試了一下....看來這個程式偏愛INTEL喔
*****AMD XP2400+(512DDR RAM)*****
AMD Athlon(tm) Processor
CPU speed: 2000.34 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE
L1 cache size: 64 KB
L2 cache size: 256 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
L1 TLBS: 32
L2 TLBS: 256
Prime95 version 23.7, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 37.259 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 43.673 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 46.876 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 59.976 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 72.238 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 86.463 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 97.448 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 133.478 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 156.167 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 198.470 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 227.832 ms.

*****Celeron 2.0GHz(256DDR RAM)*****
Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.00GHz
CPU speed: 1992.01 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 8 KB
L2 cache size: 128 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 128 bytes
TLBS: 64
Prime95 version 23.7, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 25.348 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 32.006 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 40.263 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 42.155 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 52.723 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 60.174 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 67.737 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 100.652 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 126.282 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 162.147 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 190.859 ms.

這只能說...太神奇了
:confused: :confused:

由這個數據來看,Prime95並不適合拿來當效能測試程式,所有的效能測試程式以及用商用軟體實測都顯示P4 Celeron效能其差無比,也足以證明平常跑應用程式,賽揚的表現會最差(這點不會有人懷疑吧)
而Prime95測出的數據竟然是Celeron2.0勝過XP2400....
因此弟認為Prime95拿來當穩定度測試可以,拿來測效能→無法反應真實狀況,不恰當且不適合!

zerokiller 2004-01-03 06:34 PM

引用:
Originally posted by Barracuda
由這個數據來看,Prime95並不適合拿來當效能測試程式,所有的效能測試程式以及用商用軟體實測都顯示P4 Celeron效能其差無比,也足以證明平常跑應用程式,賽揚的表現會最差(這點不會有人懷疑吧)
而Prime95測出的數據竟然是Celeron2.0勝過XP2400....
因此弟認為Prime95拿來當穩定度測試可以,拿來測效能→無法反應真實狀況,不恰當且不適合!


嗯!弟亦認為實用為主才是重點....

umi 2004-01-03 08:40 PM

AMD Athlon(tm)
CPU speed: 1672.77 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE
L1 cache size: 64 KB
L2 cache size: 256 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
L1 TLBS: 32
L2 TLBS: 256
Prime95 version 23.7, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 34.913 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 40.070 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 43.359 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 58.097 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 69.307 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 83.497 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 92.594 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 120.923 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 146.799 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 178.465 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 206.597 ms.

8RDA+ 166外頻 256mb ram 2-2-2-11

BorgMu 2004-01-03 08:53 PM

的確不太適合反應"效能" 因為Prime95似乎真的是跟大頻寬有關聯,跟SEE2 的支援度上倒是還好吧...因為我使用 A64 3000+ 測試的結果也是只比 AthlonXP 3200+(200x11)好上一些罷了.......跟 P4 800 比起來還是輸(A64可是也支援所謂的SEE2指令集的:think: ) 所以誰的頻寬粗在 Prime95之下就佔優勢了(A64依然是單通道設計)


但是以整體能力 例如 3D Mark2001 來說 A64 3000+的成績卻可跟 P4 3G抗衡:)

剎那 2004-01-03 08:55 PM

AMD TB 1.0G oc 1.33G + ASUS A7V133 + 512mb PC-133 SD-Ram

代碼:
[Sat Jan 03 21:22:11 2004]

AMD Athlon(tm) Processor
CPU speed: 1343.00 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX
L1 cache size: 64 KB
L2 cache size: 256 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
L1 TLBS: 24
L2 TLBS: 256
Prime95 version 23.7, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 55.506 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 63.584 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 68.454 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 94.860 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 111.369 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 134.306 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 151.003 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 205.995 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 249.436 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 314.981 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 366.397 ms.

iorikyo 2004-01-03 09:42 PM

Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz
CPU speed: 3000.20 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 8 KB
L2 cache size: 512 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 128 bytes
TLBS: 64
Prime95 version 23.7, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 12.054 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 14.325 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 16.415 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 19.569 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 23.897 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 28.298 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 31.701 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 41.920 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 51.227 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 60.878 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 69.139 ms.

Reich 唐 2004-01-03 11:15 PM

引用:
Originally posted by BorgMu
的確不太適合反應"效能" 因為Prime95似乎真的是跟大頻寬有關聯,跟SEE2 的支援度上倒是還好吧...因為我使用 A64 3000+ 測試的結果也是只比 AthlonXP 3200+(200x11)好上一些罷了.......跟 P4 800 比起來還是輸(A64可是也支援所謂的SEE2指令集的:think: ) 所以誰的頻寬粗在 Prime95之下就佔優勢了(A64依然是單通道設計)


但是以整體能力 例如 3D Mark2001 來說 A64 3000+的成績卻可跟 P4 3G抗衡:)

Athlon 64 3000+的PR值,大家應該都沒有意見才對:),但是"Athlon 3000+"就必須給個 :jolin: 。

alience 2004-01-04 12:06 AM

[QUOTE]Originally posted by yunono
[B]小弟用了2台試了一下....看來這個程式偏愛INTEL喔
*****AMD XP2400+(512DDR RAM)*****
AMD Athlon(tm) Processor
CPU speed: 2000.34 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE
L1 cache size: 64 KB
L2 cache size: 256 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
L1 TLBS: 32
L2 TLBS: 256
Prime95 version 23.7, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 37.259 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 43.673 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 46.876 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 59.976 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 72.238 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 86.463 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 97.448 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 133.478 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 156.167 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 198.470 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 227.832 ms.


大大您的2400+有點慢喔
小弟是Axp 166x10 8RDA+ 512MB RAM 11-2-2-2 DDR333
win xp pro sp1結果如下
AMD Athlon(tm) Processor
CPU speed: 1667 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE
L1 cache size: 64 KB
L2 cache size: 256 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
L1 TLBS: 32
L2 TLBS: 256
Prime95 version 23.7, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 33.523 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 38.453 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 41.324 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 55.865 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 66.339 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 80.369 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 88.770 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 116.401 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 140.374 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 171.482 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 197.414 ms.
而且我的背景還有跑騾子,FTP server和一堆有的沒的10幾個程式
會差在哪裡呢??1667居然比2000快??
我猜這程式不只對sse2最佳化
而是對整個P4的Netbrust架構最佳化
至於A64會輸
我猜是因為還沒有最佳化的關係

noka888 2004-01-04 01:53 AM

Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz
CPU speed: 3244.75 MHz
CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2
L1 cache size: 8 KB
L2 cache size: 512 KB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 128 bytes
TLBS: 64
Prime95 version 23.7, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 384K FFT length: 11.144 ms.
Best time for 448K FFT length: 13.277 ms.
Best time for 512K FFT length: 15.064 ms.
Best time for 640K FFT length: 18.092 ms.
Best time for 768K FFT length: 22.067 ms.
Best time for 896K FFT length: 26.172 ms.
Best time for 1024K FFT length: 29.236 ms.
Best time for 1280K FFT length: 38.358 ms.
Best time for 1536K FFT length: 47.136 ms.
Best time for 1792K FFT length: 56.113 ms.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 63.473 ms.
[Sat Jan 03 16:41:00 2004]


所有的時間均為GMT +8。 現在的時間是07:36 AM.

vBulletin Version 3.0.1
powered_by_vbulletin 2025。