初步的測試結果.disc1和disc2的影音品質並無差異.以disc1.2的同一段落.分別以ac-3和dts測試的結果.dts的聲音密度略高.其他的幾無差異.
今天將向強笙借普通版的disc2來做比對.因為除了印刷上的差異之外.disc2普通版有dts而禮盒版沒有dts.在聲音的表現部分幾乎相同的情況下.畫面是否有所差異.值得注意.

怎麼會這樣？那我禮盒版訂的不是有點白癡嗎？

A review from DVDFILE on ET 2 disk set and Box Set

Video: How Does The Disc Look?

"Both ... include the 1982 cut as well as the 2002 re-release, and surprise, surprise, both look quite good." They.. "feature the same two transfers. However, there are noticeable differences between the two... The result? A close call, and a question not so much of better or worse, but the same yet different."

"the 2002 cut" features "the new effects... and about 5 minutes of additional footage, while the original 1982 theatrical cut includes all the original material feared lost forever by fans: the original Universal opening logo, the guns, the "terrorist" line, even the correct music cues altered for the 2002 release. Just as much of a relief is that both transfers are ... exceptionally clean and free from fading... Each is at 1.85:1 widescreen and anamorphically encoded. Blacks are excellent on both, with vibrant colors and no excessive noise... some grain... the film retains a hazy, muted look... this is consistent with the intended look of the picture and every theatrical showing I've ever seen.

"The 1982 version looks more film-like, dark and smooth, but also less artificial and "pumped up." Shadow delineation also can be superior on the 1982 version, not suffering from the high contrast and sharp falloff of the 2002 version.... with very nice colors, smooth and stable hues, and an overall sharp look.

More review from DVDFILE

Audio: How Does The Disc Sound?

The tracks and bit rates are the same on both the 2-disc and 3-disc sets..... Both the 1982 and the 2002 versions include Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround EX and DTS ES 6.1 matrixed tracks, while the 2002 version also includes John Williams' excellent "Live" score conducted for the re-release world premiere in full Dolby Digital 5.1 surround, plus a French 5.1 surround track. Subtitle options on each include English captions encoded as subtitles, Spanish subtitles, and no true Closed Captioning.

Rest assured, both the 2-disc and 3-disc sets feature the same Dolby Digital and DTS options, so no one will miss out regardless of which version they choose.

Both sound pretty great, and in fact I could not detect any discernible differences between the 1982 and 2002 versions, save for the newly expanded sound cues. As only a filmmaker of Spielberg's stature could likely command, E.T. Has been fully remixed from its source, with the sound team going back to the original elements and creating a truly new and discrete surround experience. (Note, however, that on the 2002 version, the new scenes do include newly restored sound elements as most of the cut scenes were never finished. I detected no such alterations on the 1982 version.) Comparing over ten scenes between the two versions, I couldn't hear any difference, leading me to suspect the original soundtrack was remixed and restored, then simply augmented for the 2002 release. Very impressive.

E.T. certainly has never sounded better. While dynamic range is maybe just a bit shy of today's best soundtracks - this film is 20 years old - it still has a wide presence despite some occasionally tinny highs. The front soundstage benefits the most from the remix, with nice balance between the music, dialogue and effects. Williams' score now sounds even more grand, nicely deployed even to the rears, and now alive and lush were previous video versions sound canned. While surround ambiance could have been stronger - the use of the discrete rears really only kicks in with "whooshes" and the big action set pieces - it is obvious this is no mere digital process of dated elements. The .1 LFE is also quite strong, and the opening and close UFO bits rocked my couch as strongly as any mix I've ever heard.

In terms of the DTS and Dolby Digital tracks, there are some slight differences but nothing exceptional...... both performed very well. Dynamic range sounded a bit more real with a warmer midrange, and imaging from front to back is slightly improved. Surprisingly, the .1 LFE sounded about equal on each, providing enough kick to rival today's soundtracks. Either way you slice it, these are very nice presentations, and those lucky enough to have EX and/or ES decoding capabilities will get an even more enveloping experience.

Last but certainly not least, we have John Williams new 2002 "Live" score, which I found very exciting. The same yet different, not only is this exceptionally recorded with wonderful dynamic range and powerful low bass, but the subtle tweaks and changes required by the presence of a live orchestra makes for a truly unique E.T. experience. My only complaint is that once again Universal doesn't feel consumers should be able to switch audio tracks on the fly. Not only can you only access this live track via the special features menu (not the audio setup, where logically it should be), but it would have been great to be able to switch between the theatrical and live soundtracks on the fly to compare. Ah, well, at least it is here, and it does sound pretty terrific.

Jorden兄,
flag的事呢?
:)

剛剛從強崧測試的結果.沒辦法打開dts-es的flag.

那就是偵測不到了,另外,dd5.1-ex flag呢?
:)

抱歉.這個倒是沒注意到.因為注意力都放在dts上面.

Re: Re: 三區會出ET外星人嗎?
 

請問一下,那三區港版與一區版本於音效及畫質上是否有很大的差別呢?

三區台版會出嗎? 謝謝!

小弟上星期六買了一區boxset,賣港幣$400,雖比賣港幣$160雙碟版貴$240,但確是物超所值,口講無憑,不如大家看看現貨圖片吧!!!

請瀏覽以下網站:

http://www.tower3a.com/ut/attach/3136-forum-embed.jpg