PCDVD數位科技討論區

PCDVD數位科技討論區 (https://www.pcdvd.com.tw/index.php)
-   效能極限 (https://www.pcdvd.com.tw/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   Intel 承認 Prescout 比 P4 EE 還慢! (https://www.pcdvd.com.tw/showthread.php?t=249232)

pc 2003-09-20 10:20 AM

引用:
Originally posted by 天昏地暗
偏偏許多user就是吃Intel這一套:think:

我們等著看連線討論區有人po『請幫我看看電腦這樣配好不好』,
然後配出來是台p4ee或是prescott,問他用途幹嘛,
答案會是打報告、上網,偶而玩一下遊戲.......:jolin: :jolin:

ricky74817 2003-09-20 11:35 AM

引用:
Originally posted by pc
我們等著看連線討論區有人po『請幫我看看電腦這樣配好不好』,
然後配出來是台p4ee或是prescott,問他用途幹嘛,
答案會是打報告、上網,偶而玩一下遊戲.......:jolin: :jolin:


haha
~:D 說的沒錯~~~不過大部分的人不就是這樣再用的嗎???
至多寫寫程式~~玩玩影音轉檔~~差不多就是這樣了ㄅ~:)

blair 2003-09-20 11:39 AM

引用:
Originally posted by pc
我們等著看連線討論區有人po『請幫我看看電腦這樣配好不好』,
然後配出來是台p4ee或是prescott,問他用途幹嘛,
答案會是打報告、上網,偶而玩一下遊戲.......:jolin: :jolin:

就算拿現在市場上買的到的最低階配備去做以上用途一樣是笑話...
以文書處理來說,現在的電腦太快了...

JustPure 2003-09-20 11:49 AM

引用:
Originally posted by blair
就算拿現在市場上買的到的最低階配備去做以上用途一樣是笑話...
以文書處理來說,現在的電腦太快了...


套句東X購物的語氣:「有沒有?有沒有?打字完全不delay......」

takahumi 2003-09-20 11:57 AM

真的跟當初piii-s 強過p4初期依樣。看來要買電腦不必等。


選intel的原因是因為intel的晶片組好。並不是喜歡intel cpu,amd目前還是威盛的晶片,怕怕

forum 2003-09-20 12:46 PM

回覆: Intel 承認 Prescout 比 P4 EE 還慢!
 
引用:
Originally posted by HardCorr
Here

還有Ace's Hardware 有測 P4 EE.. 效能比P4 好5% 而已 (不過被Intel 給拿下.. 因為nda 的關係)


全文我有貼在這.....
http://forum.pcdvd.com.tw/showthrea...er=2&perpage=40

引用:
From http://www.aceshardware.com

Well, when I tell you guys to visit us often, I am not kidding . Drums please, here are the very first Pentium 4 EE results! A big thanks to Markus Weingartner and Kristof Sehmke!
Interestingly, Intel PR confirmed that a BIOS upgrade is not a requirement to run the new CPU. The 2MB cache will be recognized without upgrading the BIOS. This also applies for boards from other manufacturers (besides Intel).

Even more Interesting is that the default multiplier of our Pentium 4 EE test sample was 17, or in other words this seems to be a 3.4 GHz sample! Now it is possible that our AOPEN AX4C Max (i875 chipset) is responsible for this, but I doubt it. In the past 2 years, I have never seen any Intel CPU that could use a multiplier higher than it's default multiplier. Some samples were unlocked, but could only use *lower* multipliers. So, we do not even have Pentium 4 EE benchmarks, we can also add 3.4 GHz results. It seems that Intel could push the Pentium 4 EE to 3.4 GHz fairly easy, because this sample was running at 3.4 GHz with core voltage of 1.55V.

Ok, here are the benchmarks. All benchmarks are done on the AOPEN AX4CMax, with 2x 512 MB Corsair XMS DDR400 (2-3-3-7), and a Leadtek Geforce FX 5900 Ultra 256 MB. All benchmarks have been performed in Ace's lab (not in Intel's...)

kkndlin 2003-09-20 01:19 PM

引用:
Originally posted by takahumi
真的跟當初piii-s 強過p4初期依樣。看來要買電腦不必等。


選intel的原因是因為intel的晶片組好。並不是喜歡intel cpu,amd目前還是威盛的晶片,怕怕


威盛 晶片已經越做越好了

至少在 amd 平台是如此

kisha 2003-09-20 01:50 PM

引用:
Originally posted by JustPure
套句東X購物的語氣:「有沒有?有沒有?打字完全不delay......」


這個棒 東X真是騙錢

daiki 2003-09-20 01:55 PM

引用:
Originally posted by takahumi
真的跟當初piii-s 強過p4初期依樣。看來要買電腦不必等。


選intel的原因是因為intel的晶片組好。並不是喜歡intel cpu,amd目前還是威盛的晶片,怕怕

一樣的選擇:cool:

will0227 2003-09-20 02:09 PM

引用:
Originally posted by kkndlin
威盛 晶片已經越做越好了

至少在 amd 平台是如此

有刺激有進步阿
威盛的進步可以歸功於nVidia的功勞.....:D :D


所有的時間均為GMT +8。 現在的時間是10:01 PM.

vBulletin Version 3.0.1
powered_by_vbulletin 2026。