設計的相當漂亮阿
有點MAC的感覺?

看來GF-FX要賣得好廠商自己可要有一定的降溫功力了，這樣的設計成本不知道會不會很高？

除非你是用水冷,
不然你的CPU風扇隨便也比這吵...
至於數據,看看就好,
Tom's有做測試,市售一些號稱靜音的CPU散熱器,隨便都在40db以上,馬上穿幫....

NV30其實是4x2架構,也就是GF4的改版加一些翻修能有如此的表現已經不錯了

4x2架構，真的假的:eek:，我還以為NV30是全新的設計說，那NV35是全新架構嗎?

之前看nv說,好像是nv40才是全新架構???

這...
之前NV步是說NV30就是新的架構了??:D:D
不過NV40起碼也要到明年才看的到吧:p

看起來覺得只是把噪音包在塑膠外殼裡面而已...... :think: :think:
至於散熱效果.....

未知..... :confused:

Ati 那張卡
一定是假的
一切都是幻覺.....嚇不倒我的... :D :D

NV30的架構有點怪異(http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/viewt...2&highlight=4x2),
Quoted by DaveBaumann

I'm getting a number of reports from people saying that they have not managed to get more than 4 pixel per clock out for GeForce FX. Normally, if running in 32bit, the 3DMark fillrate tests will not show more than four pixels per clock on the GFFX becuase of bandwidth limitations - however, even if the colour is reduced to 16bit and 16bit textures the multitexturing performance is still twice the the single texturing performance and the single texturing is still less than half the theoretical performance of an 8x1 card (1.4Gp/s single tex, 3.4Gt/s multitex).

When Radeon 9500 PRO is run with these setting is does achieve a rate that is greater than 4 pixels per clock (as I pointed out to XBit labs in their pulled review).

Obviously I'd like to veryify these claims myself, but I don't have a board at the moment.

奇怪的是NV30有時候會以8X1架構跑,有時是以4x2架構跑,$@$#@$#$,實在是服了NVDA,


GF3~GF4~NV30講難聽一點就像P1,P2,P3一樣,改進的幅度並不像ATI架構大革新

3月4日(GDC)當天ATI就會發表R350