Tom Clancy 後期的小說越來越乏味無趣...不過這本寫的還不錯...
現在才搬上螢幕....人家蘇聯都跟北約和好了......

國外影評倒是一陣狂批???好奇怪???

Critics Report Card Overall Grade: C+

SOURCE BRIEF REVIEW GRADE*

Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Eleanor Ringel Gillespie "...may not be super smart, but it's rock solid." more... B

Chicago Sun-Times
Roger Ebert "Director Phil Alden Robinson and his writers, Paul Attanasio and Daniel Pyne, do a spellbinding job of cranking up the tension..." more... A-

Chicago Tribune
Michael Wilmington "...even the possible end of the world can't save The Sum of All Fears from its own cinematic meltdown." more... C-

Cincinnati Enquirer
Margaret A. McGurk "There is something wrong with The Sum of All
Fears..." more... B-

E! Online "... a taut script, good doses of twisting suspense, plenty of first-rate supporting players and one nuclear explosion that strikes eerily close to home..." more... B

filmcritic.com
Christopher Null "...rarely makes any sense." more... C

Hollywood Reporter
David Hunter "...may strike some as a disturbingly unhelpful experience." more... C+

Los Angeles Times
Kevin Thomas "...absorbing and disturbing..." more... B

New York Post
Lou Lumenick "...truly the 20-megaton bomb among this summer's blockbusters." more... D

New York Times
Stephen Holden "It's a striking measure of the nervousness of the country right now that a movie so full of holes should be as gripping as it is..." more... B-

ReelViews
James Berardinelli "...more demanding than the usual escapist summer fare." more... B

Seattle Post-Intelligencer
William Arnold "All told, it's a reasonably effective movie..." more... B

Slant Magazine
Ed Gonzalez "...the filmmakers hope to scare an already paranoid America into seeing past the narrative dung heap..." more... C-
USA Today
Mike Clark "...a mediocre terrorist melodrama turned even punier by real-life events..." more... C

大致還可以,但對於一個菜鳥探員就能枕救全世界(其他政客好像第三世界的軍閥般沒大腦),感覺怪怪的???

我討厭影評人，任何一面倒批評，或一面倒褒揚的都一樣!!
他們往往破壞了觀賞者直覺的興味。

我昨天跟我女朋友一起去看還蠻好看的,想不到她也喜歡看這種戲

根本不需要理會影評人...

自己喜歡就是好電影.不需要把問題複雜化...:)

亂入一下

讓我想到評論靈異第六感的景翔先生.....................:mad:

ME TOO!:D 我已對高雄的戲院沒有太多的期望了,在家看吧!:cool:

影評還不是一面倒的狂批EP2
但我還是去看了,而且覺得棒透了,DVD必敗了.........;)

影評通常批越爛的,影迷就越愛~~:D

我覺得這部片為了遷就班的幼齒年紀,硬把時空背景設定為2002年雷恩博士是個中情局菜鳥分析師.這樣一來便把本片完全與之前的獵殺 愛國 迫切3部曲徹底獨立出來,完全沒有承傳的意味.(這點不像007,不管龐德怎麼換人演,永遠風流瀟灑).

雖然沒看過小說,但之前的獵殺 迫切 與之前流行的總統命令都看過了,所以自認還算了解克蘭西的作品.我覺得本片在人物的電影角色塑造上還是樣版了些.不論是總統幕僚 壞人都有這個缺點.反而是俄國總統有讓人驚艷的感覺(沒有醜化 矮化的老毛病).至於菜鳥的雷恩博士從頭到尾則是一路毛毛躁躁的解救核彈危機,絲毫沒有日後可以在總統命令中擔任美國總統的氣質.幸好班的戲份不是那麼重,否則他的呆板演技真會拖累這部片子.

雖然寫了一些缺點,但也是愛之深責之切.這部片克蘭西親自擔任執行製作來監控品質.我想連本尊出馬也無法避免小說改編成電影的失真吧.(這好比叫金庸來當他自己小說的改編電影電視劇的導演或編劇,他也無能為力吧)