PCDVD數位科技討論區 - 燒燒燒~~AquaMark3正式推出了~~

PCDVD數位科技討論區 (https://www.pcdvd.com.tw/index.php)

- 顯示卡討論區 (https://www.pcdvd.com.tw/forumdisplay.php?f=8)

- - 燒燒燒~~AquaMark3正式推出了~~ (https://www.pcdvd.com.tw/showthread.php?t=247721)

慘啊..

ES版PIII-1.4G 256K的 (140*10.5)=1470
TUSL2-C
512M
V7700 64M

GFX:387 (3.73FPS...要換了..唉唉唉)
CPU:4688(尚可)
總分:3731

跟GPF兄的P3-S 1.4的512K 果然有差

引用:

Originally posted by petitdragon
咦?:confused: 為何不知道他評分的方法? 文件不是和軟體一起安裝到你的電腦裡了嗎! 要仔細看阿! ;)

看過了
他的分數是把avgFPS CPU x 50 = CPU score
avgFPS GFX x 100 = GFX score
他也有提到CPU score會受到CPU速度和記憶體等subsystem的影響
但畢竟講的太籠統，且測出來的分數就是怪
有興趣的人可以去看AquaMark3 Documentation Chapter7

我的小賽賽1.2G oc 1.34G + R8500LE(8500BIOS)的分數：（不知是好是壞！？）

（圖怎麼貼不出來？）

引用:

Originally posted by luke929
看過了
他的分數是把avgFPS CPU x 50 = CPU score
avgFPS GFX x 100 = GFX score
他也有提到CPU score會受到CPU速度和記憶體等subsystem的影響
但畢竟講的太籠統，且測出來的分數就是怪
有興趣的人可以去看AquaMark3 Documentation Chapter7

人家明明就有說CPU分數代表什麼!
CPU分數代表物理表現與人工智能
GPU分數代表繪圖效能
這樣你還能說CPU分數「看看就好」?

===========================
Two other AvgFPS values can be found in the output files: The AvgFPS CPU and the AvgFPS GFX
that are both based on single frame measurements. Each frame takes a certain amount of time to
complete. The first part of each frame calculation is spent on simulating the game physics and artificial
intelligence on the CPU, the second part is spent on rendering the graphics. Both parts are measured
independently. Based on these values the two theoretical AvgFPS values are computed, as if each of
these frame parts would have been processed individually. Note that the absolute value of these two
measurements is of theoretical nature, but considering these values in relation to values of other test
systems allow a performance judgment of the two mainly stressed components.

引用:

Originally posted by HigH
人家明明就有說CPU分數代表什麼!
CPU分數代表物理表現與人工智能
GPU分數代表繪圖效能
這樣你還能說CPU分數「看看就好」?

===========================
Two other AvgFPS values can be found in the output files: The AvgFPS CPU and the AvgFPS GFX
that are both based on single frame measurements. Each frame takes a certain amount of time to
complete. The first part of each frame calculation is spent on simulating the game physics and artificial
intelligence on the CPU, the second part is spent on rendering the graphics. Both parts are measured
independently. Based on these values the two theoretical AvgFPS values are computed, as if each of
these frame parts would have been processed individually. Note that the absolute value of these two
measurements is of theoretical nature, but considering these values in relation to values of other test
systems allow a performance judgment of the two mainly stressed components.

你很怪耶，就說你要信就信，你要參考就參考
是怎樣，你一定要講到我也信就對了
我的P4 3.15G和P3 1.4G的分數只差300多分
卻和雙通道的P4 3G差5000分?
CPU分數代表物理表現與人工智能，那我的電腦大概是AI智障囉，哈哈哈

這個軟體已經從我的電腦移除了

還是3dmark03比較明朗

小小心得

Demo的爆炸音效聽起來怪怪的:jolin:

引用:

Originally posted by luke929
你很怪耶，就說你要信就信，你要參考就參考
是怎樣，你一定要講到我也信就對了
我的P4 3.15G和P3 1.4G的分數只差300多分
卻和雙通道的P4 3G差5000分?
CPU分數代表物理表現與人工智能，那我的電腦大概是AI智障囉，哈哈哈

人家測什麼都寫給你看了,怪不怪也有跡可循
難道只因為你不信,白紙黑字就會變成別的東西嗎?
時脈差不多分數卻差5000分
搞不好跟使用者的智力有直接關聯也說不定

引用:

Originally posted by HigH
人家測什麼都寫給你看了,怪不怪也有跡可循
難道只因為你不信,白紙黑字就會變成別的東西嗎?
時脈差不多分數卻差5000分
搞不好跟使用者的智力有直接關聯也說不定

請勿做人身攻擊
我從頭到尾並無對你惡言相向
我調侃我自己的電腦有冒犯到你嗎?
如果你認為我說你很怪讓你很不高興，我在此對你道歉，對不起
我不希望一篇討論變成爭論

引用:

不敢苟同全球都知道理論上不會差那麼多